Literally 90% of them are just obvious shit posts tho lol. Some of them are real
I take everyone's views inyo account. Conor is just one of those topics where people are clearly heavily emotionally influenced, biased and only interested in one particular narrative, whichever makes him look worse.
I can come with some realness, be super reasonable, shed light on multiple angles, play devils advocate etc..and people will construe it as nuthuggery.
Most people are just very black and white in their thinking. Not only that, add in hate and emotional influence, lack of tangible experience. Group think becomes powerful in these circumstances as well. People just ping off each others confirmation biases and dont even ask what else is there? What am i not seeing?
Am i really sucking anyones nuts or just exposing subtle holes in how some people think and reason?
The grand scheme meaning, why i defend him ultimately has nothing to do with Conor. Everything to do with caring about what is objectively true regardless of the topic
And again, with anything related to Conor, the short sightedness is just profound. More so than any other figure in mma history