I'm not sure he's wrong though.
He took more damage in the second round of the Khabib bout and the third was his most successful round of the fight.
I think it's silly to assume that the bout was over based on the success Poirier was having.
Poirier may have won but it's impossible to say anything definitive based on what happened.
The fight was stopped for an injury, akin to a fighter blowing out their knee. I think that reality is something that needs to be objectively acknowledged.
A definitive result can only be determined in a rematch. Which is precisely what Dana is planning on doing.
I feel like if it were any other fighter, everything I've said here would be acknowledged as being very rational and logical. But there is a very real double standard with all things McGregor.
If a tennis player blew out their knee out during a match, would that be considered a loss? That should highlight the absurdly of the logic and lack of critical thought being demonstrated by many.
And for the record, because I know certain people will assume it. I'm not a "fan" of McGregor. I have irish friends who have definitive proof that he is in fact a rapist. I have no interest in being unfavorable in any way, shape or form with regards to him.
That being said, I think that truth should be spoken, regardless of the name of the fighter and I don't think that sort of fairness is common with polarizing figures who spawn such emotionally reactive thought.
A rematch is the only way to produce a definitive result and there's really no way to argue against this.