The side that believes their Sexual predator ex-pres was sent by god
is somehow more pro-science? You are incredibly ignorant or just plain stupid. Either way, your statement is flat WRONG.
there are multiple core right wing ideologies and beliefs that are directly contradicted by scientific consensus.
- Denial of global warming, which is literally uncontested among climatologists.
- Belief in creationism, which no serious biologists endorse.
- Opposition to gay rights on the grounds that gay marriage and adoption is bad for children, despite multiple authoritative studies to the contrary.
- Support for North Carolina's HB2 and similar anti-transgender laws on the basis of protecting women, despite theres not many actual cases of assault in bathrooms by transgender people.
- Belief that vaccines cause autism, a position so discredited that the journal that originally published it rescinded the article.
- Belief that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, despite the total lack of concrete evidence and presence of documents to the contrary.
Meanwhile, among Libs, I cant think of any major policy or ideology points that are directly contradicted by science. there are some things like the gender wage gap or the efficacy of gun control, but its not even close. far-left craziness is far less dominant in the party mainstream than far-right craziness.
The orange rapist still thinks climate change is a Chinese hoax and vaccines cause autism.
Kremlin suck-dolls like MTJ and Boebert are still spreading conspiracy theories and misinformation with no repercussions.
The day a democratic president/Vice President/presidential nominee starts talking about auras and chakras then we can talk about how "both sides are bad".