D
Deleted member 556651
Guest
Fighter A is ranked above 10 fighters who he never fought cause he beat fighter B. is that not mma math?
i mean everyone goes on how mma math isnt accurate and is used by casuals etc.. no one stops to think that the entire rankings system is voted upon using mma math? you realize that most ppl at most divisions only have 2-3 top 15 wins?
a top 5 didnt beat the 10 guys behind him he beat 1 or 2 and using mathematical equations we concluded that hes better than those 10 guys. yes those equations can be wrong some times but most of the time theyre not.
my conclusion is that mma math works more often than not and everyone is using it without giving it any credit.
Thoughts?
i mean everyone goes on how mma math isnt accurate and is used by casuals etc.. no one stops to think that the entire rankings system is voted upon using mma math? you realize that most ppl at most divisions only have 2-3 top 15 wins?
a top 5 didnt beat the 10 guys behind him he beat 1 or 2 and using mathematical equations we concluded that hes better than those 10 guys. yes those equations can be wrong some times but most of the time theyre not.
my conclusion is that mma math works more often than not and everyone is using it without giving it any credit.
Thoughts?
Last edited by a moderator: