- Joined
- Jan 17, 2020
- Messages
- 7,033
- Reaction score
- 13,793
This is where a parliamentary system might be better. Our system does more to encourage bipartisanship, which is great most of the time. But when it's just not happening, you can get gridlock with a needed resolution but no clear path to one. I think if people would chill out a bit, they'd get that we'd all be better off letting one party win decisively and enact the policies it thinks are best, and then letting the voters judge the results of that process and change policies as they see fit. But people think in apocalyptic terms--if the other party enacts X, we're all going to die!--and so we don't really get experimentation, and politics is always these brutal struggles. I can kind of sympathize on some policies--like Republicans correctly feared that if the ACA passed, it would be effective and then become too popular to reverse, and Democrats correctly feared that if Republicans took over the SCOTUS, they'd kill abortion rights, with other rights on the chopping block. But I think policy working and becoming too popular to reverse is good, and Republicans have paid a price for the Roe reversal, and we're seeing states make surprising moves to repair the situation--the system heals.It’s not really a mystery, imo. A large percentage of people would rather have no government than let democrats have any say at all in policy.
I can sympathize (usually as it applies to republicans), but I wouldn’t go so far as to discount the concerns of half the country just because I disagree. Unfortunately, some of us seem to have lost the ability to accept any kind of compromise. That’s why Trump’s pure authoritarian platform is so appealing, I guess.
No you wouldn't you would either drown if you go by river or get lost and die in the desert/mountains if you go that route.I would probably get damn pretty far. Only morons think the border is secure because some of the illegals get caught.
Pretty acurate analogy actually for Border issue.*serial killer murders someone*
serial killer: help me resuscitate them
person b: wtf. no.
serial killer: u don't care about people!
this goes for all sides. you don't negotiate with bad faith actors who spend years undermining you then pretending to care when it's to their advantage.
No I wouldn't. There's plenty of video of people walking across the border illegally and unchallenged.No you wouldn't you would either drown if you go by river or get lost and die in the desert/mountains if you go that route.
If you go within walking distance of civilization you will get picked up fast by the border patrol.
There is a reason why drug dealers would rather risk getting their drugs through ports of entry rather than going through the wilderness.
From a policy perspective he's definitely been successful. Obviously, Republicans will hate anything that comes from a Democratic POTUS and decry "communism" and "socialism" for anything passed but he's definitely passed a lot (Infrastructure, Innovation and competition act, CHIPs Act, Inflation and Reduction Act).
It’s not really a mystery, imo. A large percentage of people would rather have no government than let democrats have any say at all in policy.
I can sympathize (usually as it applies to republicans), but I wouldn’t go so far as to discount the concerns of half the country just because I disagree. Unfortunately, some of us seem to have lost the ability to accept any kind of compromise. That’s why Trump’s pure authoritarian platform is so appealing, I guess.
Not sure if you're joking, but note that net job growth in Trump's presidency was negative (and has come roaring back since he left), crime spiked during his presidency (and has fallen since he left), he left office in the midst of a national health crisis (which was fixed by his successor). Without even getting into his almost comical level of corruption and the embarrassment he was as head of state, he easily has the worst performance record of any president ever.seriously dembros, if you admit trump's better for the country come forward. no hate.
Hahahaha…. You mean trying to “fix” what the moron broke when he he took over by handing out more “free” money
The Inflation Reduction act that super charged inflation by flooding the economy with more money
And inflation is still twice what it was under Trump.
It’ll take a decade for undo the damage of hyperinflation
Hahahaha…. You mean trying to “fix” what the moron broke when he he took over by handing out more “free” money
The Inflation Reduction act that super charged inflation by flooding the economy with more money
And inflation is still twice what it was under Trump.
It’ll take a decade for undo the damage of hyperinflation
@Sinister vote for trump. leave the side that's weakened and destabilized the country. trump's a shithead but he delivers.
do you want results or just talk? everyone's poorer under biden and will he destroy what's left if he gets another term.
Inflation (which has happened all around the world) was brought on by supply and demand issues caused by COVID and the COVID lockdowns.
Not sure if you're joking, but note that net job growth in Trump's presidency was negative (and has come roaring back since he left), crime spiked during his presidency (and has fallen since he left), he left office in the midst of a national health crisis (which was fixed by his successor). Without even getting into his almost comical level of corruption and the embarrassment he was as head of state, he easily has the worst performance record of any president ever.
The Great Reset. loved by democrats and establishment GOP.
get the globalists out. trump is a not a globalist.
Trump is the very definition of a globalist. He has always been one.
trump gave the globalists the middle finger right on their own turf lol
@Sinister vote for trump. leave the side that's weakened and destabilized the country. trump's a shithead but he delivers.
do you want results or just talk? everyone's poorer under biden and will he destroy what's left if he gets another term.