- Joined
- Dec 7, 2002
- Messages
- 8,896
- Reaction score
- 3,904
Yeah, we've all heard the quote. We live in an age of information, where the scientific method is alive and well.
This isn't a malleable nuanced subset of data like what you're referencing utilized for political or monetary gain where some Deep Throat scientist working for Soros is changing information to fit a narrative (Not to mention, Twain lived in a very different world). The statistical hackery that exists in the political realm is not the same as in academia where checks and balances still hold a torch (peer review, etc). This is very black and white points of immutable mathematics based on numerous social scientists work. As in, the data points don't delve into the nitty gritty of the why, or seek to manipulate the axes on a chart to stretch the truth. It's all yes or no, if this then that.
115+ studies that are referenced > Some dude on the internet's opinion because he doesn't like the results.
I came at you with hard facts, you just have a feeling they arent correct. Agree to disagree I guess, even though I don't know what your argument is. And, by the way, probably 70% more likely to get Monkey Pox with the way I do it.
DYOR from here on out.
I'm not sure if I agree with your interpretation of the statistics - many of the criteria that are deemed as influencing the long term success of marriages are outside the control of the individual (i.e. single parent vs. dual parent households).Given that many of the antecedents to marital longevity are based on socioeconomic factors, higher rates of divorce are more likely among those that are poor, have low educational attainment etc.
You argument seems to be premised that people can make actionable choices that reduce the likelihood of divorce - I think that is a partial truth. There are clearly exogenous factors at play that cannot be controlled by a person.