- Joined
- Jan 25, 2016
- Messages
- 23,206
- Reaction score
- 17,873
The tightrope I'd walk there is if you can safely give a criminal a beating, you shouldn't be punished. But also, don't ever put yourself at risk because of a bit of stock.
Those guys in the video the other week where a guy was robbing them, cleaning the shelves, but ended up getting a bit of stick? No worries. No harm, no foul. The beating he took was 'to stop him escaping' even if it wasn't, and we should look away and not punish those guys.
But those guys could also have been shot in the face, no business is ever worth that. Protect at your own risk, unfortunately.
As a general rule, I don't care too much about 'a civil society' stopping thieves or robbers with a bit of force. It can get a little extreme in 'shithole' countries though, where people are brutalized way beyond sense, though, so free rein should never be afforded to vigilantes.
Indeed its a tightrope. Its also an insanely personal issue to me I suppose i really have an intense hatred in my heart for thieves . I deliver a lot of pizzas and I am never going to just up and let someone rob me if i dont have to. I also think when it comes to a robbery like in a shop you can get killed just as easily complying and I know you know I can show you video after video of shopkeeps getting blasted even when they play ball. As long as the violence is reasonable and you stop when its over than it seems civil to me. I think we kinda agree here to a degree. If were being super honest I am kinda pro vigilante in spirit and in a perfect world we wouldnt need a legal system as whatever clan you just wronged would come and sort you out but im aware that system could only work if humans were perfect and didnt make mistakes so its not possible