- Joined
- Nov 20, 2006
- Messages
- 21,452
- Reaction score
- 46,865
RIP to my 70,000 likes..
On mobile at least, the forum at times has been slowing down to a crawl and sometimes outright freezing my browser..Not sure where you’re getting that idea from. I’m not involved with tech at all, but we were having site shutdowns daily for close to an hour right before they reset it. Haven’t seen one since. There was a clear issue, and it was clearly resolved. What has gotten worse?
I don't post that often, so I was unaware of the overall changes. Over 15 years , I have just a little over 1600 posts, so when I see only 20+ likes. it certainly appears that my posts are irrelevant. Looking at it from that perspective, it certainly jarred me when I noticed that they removed some 600+ likes.Their likes get Boosted the same way they were before, some people (Mods) can like as much as they want, and people with Memberships can like as much as they want(Could be wrong about the Membership one)
You gotta have somebody on the Moderator team that REALLY fucks with you to get your likes up a decent amount.
All speculation of course, but everyone got Fucked over, the Mods sparred nobody.
You think you don’t post very much...I don't post that often, so I was unaware of the overall changes. Over 15 years , I have just a little over 1600 posts, so when I see only 20+ likes. it certainly appears that my posts are irrelevant. Looking at it from that perspective, it certainly jarred me when I noticed that they removed some 600+ likes.
I think you just called @Wadtucket a whoreIf anyone has given another person 1000 likes, they are forum bf/gf
Commitment issues, he learned to share himself.I think you just called @Wadtucket a whore
I love whoring for likes
I don't know how long I've been looking at this ↑↑↑ gif...
I don't know how long I've been looking at this ↑↑↑ gif...
I can't read your small 300-like font.Best thing that happened to this forum since ass floss was allowed. They should go further and purge the likes every quarter.
Well... It's not entirely inaccurate.I think you just called @Wadtucket a whore
They just aren't designed for that kind of complex calculation.Because counting items is apparently really hard on computers. Who knew?