Judge and Jury
Green Belt
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2012
- Messages
- 986
- Reaction score
- 0
This is the only part that I agree with on your post... I dont think Jones could hold Silva down like Chael did.... in pure wrestling knowledge Chael or Henderson are 10000X better than Jones and even they couldnt do it.
Im not saying Jones couldnt win, I just think this is such a good fight I wouldnt know who to pick but I honestly favor Silva. Silva is the kind of genius fighter that he can pull a move out of his ass that youve never seen before and the fight is over, that kind of genius Jones simply doesnt have and that will be difference in the fight.
I agree completely the GSP fight doesnt make any sense, it simply doesnt prove anything
this is pretty much the only post i've seen that made atleast a little bit of sense.
This thread is filled with more theoretical nonsense that are only opinion and yet people are claiming them to be facts. TS opens is story with how (this is 100% accurate) when it hasn't even happened yet.
The second place TS lost me is when he compared Silva to everyone Jones has faced. Silva is miles above Belfort and even he lasted 4 rounds on the bottom. he was even pulling guard to make sure the fight got to the ground.
Silva has a history for his durability and for not getting cut. why is it that Jones is the guy to destroy him on the ground and do things to him that noone else has??
Jones doesn't have an explosive double take down he uses sweeps and trips from the clinch, who is the master of the clinch? SILVA!!
those kicks to the knee wont work on silva as quite literally as far as the UFC goes he invented them.
I can totally see why Bones would be favoured in this fight to win but anyone saying that He would !00% win and that he's a nightmare for Silva needs to have their head examined.
good old sherdog thinking that anyone with any sort of wrestling credential and that has ever subbed anyone can automatically beat the consensus worlds best fighter.