Trump- Russia collusion megathread v7: still a NOTHINGBURGER edition

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

Impanelment should help speed up the jailing process.

It's scary how many people are advocating for removing a man's freedom without any evidence

 

[P4p Islam]

Alright @Madmick, 1000th post of the thread.


Close her up and make v8 for us.

 

[JosephDredd]

Right but you can't just start investigating EVERYTHING without cause

The only people who think that's what happened here are idiot Trump supporters. If Mueller had done something against the law, Trump and his legal team would have shut him down right quick. Instead Trump is stuck talking about firing Mueller, replacing Sessions or pardoning his family.

You have absolutely no reason to think anything happened here without due process.

 

[P4p Islam]

It's scary how many people are advocating for removing a man's freedom without any evidence

Who do you assume I'm talking about?

 

[Rational Poster]

So Trump gave up his 4th amendment right when he became president. I didn't know this

 

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

The only people who think that's what happened here are idiot Trump supporters. If Mueller had done something against the law, Trump and his legal team would have shut him down right quick. Instead Trump is stuck talking about firing Mueller, replacing Sessions or pardoning his family.

You have absolutely no reason to think anything happened here without due process.

"I don't see this Grand Jury as that ominous a sign for team Trump unless there is something from his past that is out of the ordinary."

This was the context of me bringing up due process. I was saying because of due process you can't just go digging through the past aimlessly.

 

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

Use your big boy words. Somebody suggested he might have dirt in his past. I'm saying unless they're specifically investigating that, it would violate his 4th amendment right to go snooping around a decade ago when your investigation is into the election timeframe

 

[Rational Poster]

Use your big boy words. Somebody suggested he might have dirt in his past. I'm saying unless they're specifically investigating that, it would violate his 4th amendment right to go snooping around a decade ago when your investigation is into the election timeframe

Just because you can say it doesn't mean you're right.

 

[P4p Islam]

I don't know what this emoji is supposed to signify.

 

[Rational Poster]

I don't know what this emoji is supposed to signify.

That's Stannis Baratheon disgusted with @oleDirtyBast4rd 's shitposting.

 

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

Just because you can say it doesn't mean you're right.

Read the 4th amendment and explain how I'm wrong. I don't make many claims here on sherdog. I typically ask questions.

"...no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

 

[P4p Islam]

That's Stannis Baratheon disgusted with @oleDirtyBast4rd 's shitposting.

Ah. I assume it's GoT? I've never watched GoT.

 

[FacePunch]

So Trump gave up his 4th amendment right when he became president. I didn't know this

You don't understand how the 4th amendment works.

 

[FacePunch]

Read the 4th amendment and explain how I'm wrong. I don't make many claims here on sherdog. I typically ask questions.

"...no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

You don't understand how probable cause works, or what search and seizure is.

 

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

You don't understand how probable cause works, or what search and seizure is.

Per the 4th, you can't randomly search for evidence unrelated to an investigation. Do we agree so far?