It's comparable because being in control of a low volume contest will not sap your energy the same way as a fight against someone actually fighting you would
Nunes-Pennington was a "low volume contest"?! Have you even watched the fight?
As for the Shevchenko rematch, the "low volume" sure seemed to sap the much smaller Shevchenko's energy reserves, as Nunes' cardio was superior to her's in the 5th round. That's a big difference from the 3rd round of their first fight, where Nunes was the one who was exhausted.
SBJJ said:
To act as if her last 4 fights prove she has fixed her stamina issues in a way that she could deal with the non stop pressure of a larger stronger fighter is reaching
This is so absurd. You're ignoring the evidence of her last two fights within the past year to fixate on what happened 5 fights and 3 years ago?
SBJJ said:
Time for some serious discussion. Nunes has shown that grappling and clinching can really sap her energy. What happens when she has to deal with the bigger stronger fighter here.
When has she "shown" this? All the way back against Zingano?!
Nevermind the fact that Cyborg almost certainly won't grapple and isn't particularly good at it, looking at her fights in the UFC.
SBJJ said:
Nunes is a good dog. I'm not arguing her price.
You are. You stated that you would put $10k down on Cyborg at -200, which is absolutely insane.
I do find it funny that
@ill800 agrees with you, considering he thought it was a bad idea for me to bet a mere 12 units on Tito versus Chuck last month. Yet, he thinks Cyborg for that same price against a fighter who matches or surpasses her in almost every technical aspect of striking and grappling, is faster, hits about as hard, and is just a little smaller and weaker is a good bet for $10k?
I guess we can thank Cyborg's mystique and Nunes being perpetually underrated for the juicy line.