- Joined
- Feb 26, 2017
- Messages
- 2,928
- Reaction score
- 476
He did nice breakdowns of fights but dissappeared after Vicks lost. He was very confident in James that he will winwho da fook is kyle
He did nice breakdowns of fights but dissappeared after Vicks lost. He was very confident in James that he will winwho da fook is kyle
He did nice breakdowns of fights but dissappeared after Vicks lost. He was very confident in James that he will win
He looks like simpson himself lol f*ck this guy.I would never ever pick James fucking Vick in a fight lmao. Hate the prick and still watch the Gaethje fight for breakfast. That was some ridiculous underdog money. I remember when Twitter was full of "Vick will outbox Homer Simpson".
I don't think you can compare a 20 second knockout against a top 10~ fighter to a 3 round clear win. We know Reyes got good technique, can defend takedowns, got cardio for 15 minutes etc. We don't know that about Walker.Johnny Walker is just as a hype train as Reyes is. Hype trains are not a bad thing and they can be justified. Both guys beat similar type of fighters (Khalil & Ledet> Kimball, Christensen. Cannonier at LHW was about the same level as Khalil & Ledet, Cirkunov = OSP).
He looks like simpson himself lol f*ck this guy.
What your picks for this event ?
what happened to @Kyle Stephens ?
He got broken like batman by bane. Sad. Thanks for The info.I knew he wouldn't last at all. He wasn't awful with analysis, but he was pathetic at assessing confidence levels. He'd often call some difficult fights fairly accurately, but he wouldn't bet on those. He'd basically pick 1 or 2 fights that he thought was a sure thing, and go with those. IIRC, he was already on a losing streak heading into a huge 10u bet on Vick. Someone he was "110% sure" would win. Some people really are better off betting more fights. They may be good at capping fights in a card as a whole. They aren't as good at finding one with the most perceived value.
Another thing that he had issues with is realizing he made a bad bet. This is a common trait for people that won't last betting. When they lose, they always blame the fighter. Or it was some unusual circumstance. Or that all tape didn't point to that outcome. This may be true a small % of the time, but there are people out there who saw it the other way and bet it. Sit back and think about where you went wrong.
Kyle ain't coming back like my boy Bruce Wayne tho.He got broken like batman by bane. Sad. Thanks for The info.
He got broken like batman by bane. Sad. Thanks for The info.
diakiese ready to put the old dog downOh I forgot what I originally came in here for lol.
http://mmareload.com/joe-duffy-can-...-of-the-tunnel/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
Duffy apparently has been sidelined because of a shoulder injury that needed surgery and a rib injury. Says he's itching to get back in the octagon. Wants to revel in the feeling of being under the bright lights.
Great this. Ty!I competed in a wrestling tourney with Grundy about 15 years ago, he was on the other side of the bracket and came 1st (beating some Greek kid who beat me in the 1st round who had come 5th in the junior worlds the year before or something). IMO he is possibly the best British wrestler of the last ~20+ years for as much as that's worth (an actual wrestler, not 'mma wrestler' like the other britbongs on the card).
I asked someone who knows both well who they thought would win, they suggested Nad (heh heh) "might get thrown around a bit" but noted Nad (*snicker*) had better experience (2 UFC wins + Paddy Pimplebutt) and BJJ (said he was a black belt... but is that true?). They declined to offer an opinion on who they thought would win. I've bet on Grundy.