Discussion in 'MMA Betting Discussion' started by EzFlyer, Aug 5, 2017.
Tragic event for me
rewatch it tomorrow u trippin
if anyone should have a 10-8 its pettis for fucking moreno up in the third(?), hanging onto someone back without doing anything is not a 10-8 even with the new ruling criteria
It's funny how you act like its inconceivable for draw lol…Moreno didn't win but it def could be judged draw.
wow! I bet Sergio BIIIIIG but thought that decision was wrong.
So I think the CORRECT guy won.
The BETTER fighter won.
But if r1 wasn't a 10-8 then what is?
Buuuut.... I thought r3 Sergio was 10-8 as it was extremely lopsided and under new rules its a 10-8
Sorry any Serg backers. I will show you a parlay I have busted with Randa that made me cry if it's any consolation.
You have never seen more dominantion displayed than Moreno did in round one? I will rewatch it now lol
Moreno looked like shit, that's what the judges saw.
His face was bloodied up, kept eating rights and swinging that left overhand like an ape, which missed every fucking time. Moreno did well in grappling but the judges must have payed more attention to Pettis dominating the stand up with clean technical striking.
I had not a single fucking doubt in my mind that that was a unanimous decision
Sorry for Moreno bettors. I did feel 49-46 was a better score than 48-47.
Yes. Exactly. You do ok? I lost Suga and hit Serg
Totally disagree here even as a grappler and grappling coach.
So he took the back and held the position for 3 minutes. Was never close to hitting the choke and didn't hurt Pettis from that position. Rd 3 had a better argument for being 10-8, as Moreno was getting his ass beaten up.
i would have won about 2k if rashad had just been more active in the clinch, aggravating.
up £654 which is still good, but i need to claw back way more after getting killed the previous 2 events.
pettis was better and deserved to win for sure. i agree with decision
it's just surprising that it wasn't a draw by at least one judge. in mexico. and one even gave it a 49-46 lol (????). what's hard to understand about that?
That's crazy. We seen less dominant rounds be scored 10-8 under the new scoring criteria. I'm too tired to think of any specific example but i'm 100% sure of that.
Why are you assuming judging consistency though? MMA judging has never been consistent and I doubt it ever will be.
Similar for me. This event put me back in the black after significant losses last weekend.
ugh threw away the little profit i had tonight betting moreno in r5 after the td (+400) (+340) thinking he might get a hometown dec with r1 10-8 and semi close r4 / r5
also if Jouban had not come out to Eminem like a dumbass i would have had +7u profit =/
Are you even taking into account round 1 could have been 10-8 or that the fight is in Mexico?? Just seems like you are purely basing this off your own views and not thinking about other variables,..,
Based on previous scorecards with the new judging criteria this should have been 10-8. My assumption was based on that.
I had it 49-46 pettis
are all you draw scorers on Moreno???
How is rd 1 a 10-8? There was very little damage and no close sub. 10-8 isn't a horrendous score, but its still a 10-9 to me.
Then pettis won every other round 10-9.
Hit pettis ML and the over.
Went 2-1 on bets and make 2.43u, im not complaining
If u had no doubt on the decision of that fight then u had no money on it.
I always have doubts
Separate names with a comma.