- Joined
- Oct 1, 2016
- Messages
- 3,515
- Reaction score
- 0
On Fili ml, itd and u2.5
http://fightmetric.com/fight-details/f20e742e6b0c0b3bCmon people... Casey landed more volume and did more damage, but I know, prebets makes one biased
I don't know why everyone was so confident Hill was winning, my money was on her and I thought Casey was edging it on the scorecards
Okay, a little less volume but def more damage
Casey’s best rd was the first and I still think she lost the rd. Those were her most effective strikes landed but Hill ate themThere's a level of subjectivity to judging for sure, but I sometimes wonder if judges (and quite frankly people on here giving opinions) have ever trained or been punched/kicked. When I watch these fights and you see strikes landing, having gotten hit and having landed strikes I feel like I have a better feel for how "good" a strike is. @Tebowned I'd like your thoughts. I see sig strike #'s and sometimes I think "Okay they are about even, but wow I'd rather have been figther x that round than fighter y". To me that should determine close rounds. Hill really looked to be landing the sharper, more flush strikes to me the majority of the time.
ppl think it was a terrible fight so nobody cares, reminds me of Letorneau vs Pereira.Media scoring for Hill as well
Smh 30-27