- Joined
- Sep 30, 2016
- Messages
- 5,027
- Reaction score
- 3,145
No you are the one whose speculating. We saw Santos fight for three rounds with both eyes in tact and she won all three of them on most scorecards.
The striking on the feet wasn't particularly meaningful in either direction for the first three rounds; it more or less cancelled out with a slight edge to Shevchenko.
Valentina only began having meaningful success on the feet after the clash of heads. Theres no reason to believe Santos would not have enjoyed similar success during the final two rounds had the clash of heads not occurred.
20 out of 28 media members scored the fight for Valentina. Most people didn't have it 3-0.1
To those saying Santos kept taking her down yet did no damage........ I ask what damage did Val do to out show Santos enough to make up for the take downs. Only damaging blow by Vsl I saw was an illegal head butt. Maybe Santos wasn't doing much damage but was taking her down and controlling the fight.
I had it 4 - 1 Santos just because Val didn't do anything either and the only thing to separate the rounds really was the tske downs unless you count the head butt as offense.
Scoring the 4th round for Santos because of a late takedown is the WORST part about MMA judging. If all people scored like that it would be a terrible sport.