- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 92,875
- Reaction score
- 28,806
Thats not how I understand Hamilton's Federalist Papers, particularly 9 and 10 regarding Factions, but I'm not a historian or a lawyer.
@Lord Coke @Limbo Pete What say you about the Electoral College w/ relation to the Federalist Papers (9 & 10) and factions.
Its my understanding that the EC was meant to protect a majority as much as a minority from mob rule of sorts?
Hamilton didn't write Federalist 10.
The way the EC protects us from "mob rule" is by preventing the public from directly voting for president (we'd just vote for electors who are wiser and more knowledgeable and then the House would usually select the actual president). Having pledged electors already ends that (that is, the current EC is what the founders considered mob rule). Nothing to do with making sure that people in some states have disproportionate say in the election.
Also, I'm pretty sure you didn't read Federalist 9 or 10. 68 is the one you want here. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed68.asp
It was equally desirable, that the immediate election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice. A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations.
It was also peculiarly desirable to afford as little opportunity as possible to tumult and disorder. This evil was not least to be dreaded in the election of a magistrate, who was to have so important an agency in the administration of the government as the President of the United States. But the precautions which have been so happily concerted in the system under consideration, promise an effectual security against this mischief. The choice of SEVERAL, to form an intermediate body of electors, will be much less apt to convulse the community with any extraordinary or violent movements, than the choice of ONE who was himself to be the final object of the public wishes. And as the electors, chosen in each State, are to assemble and vote in the State in which they are chosen, this detached and divided situation will expose them much less to heats and ferments, which might be communicated from them to the people, than if they were all to be convened at one time, in one place.
...
All these advantages will happily combine in the plan devised by the convention; which is, that the people of each State shall choose a number of persons as electors, equal to the number of senators and representatives of such State in the national government, who shall assemble within the State, and vote for some fit person as President. Their votes, thus given, are to be transmitted to the seat of the national government, and the person who may happen to have a majority of the whole number of votes will be the President. But as a majority of the votes might not always happen to centre in one man, and as it might be unsafe to permit less than a majority to be conclusive, it is provided that, in such a contingency, the House of Representatives shall select out of the candidates who shall have the five highest number of votes, the man who in their opinion may be best qualified for the office.
The process of election affords a moral certainty, that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications. Talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity, may alone suffice to elevate a man to the first honors in a single State; but it will require other talents, and a different kind of merit, to establish him in the esteem and confidence of the whole Union, or of so considerable a portion of it as would be necessary to make him a successful candidate for the distinguished office of President of the United States.
Obviously that's before the 12th Amendment (which among other things, changed it from the top 5 to the top 3 EC vote-getters for the House to decide among).
How any of this ties into your weird obsession with Clinton is a mystery.