- Joined
- Aug 8, 2016
- Messages
- 1,240
- Reaction score
- 110
A few early reads for me after tape study :
Hunt
Brunson
Cutelaba
Steetle
Ottow
Ashkan
Kim
Hunt
Brunson
Cutelaba
Steetle
Ottow
Ashkan
Kim
Far less chance here mate, they are HWs, both have less than amazing gas and its a 5 rounder. I would guess maybe 1 in 50 chance it goes to points.
Stats in mma are pretty worthless. Not entirely worthless, but close. Using stats as a main way of seeing what someone's striking defense or takedown defense is is not good.okay...youre probably one of those guys that gamble and dont use compubox or fight metrics
good luck with that
i always get a kick out of the people that say stats are worthless
Ashkan Mokhtarian (fighting John moraga)
13-1, 31 years old (6kos and 6subs)
Mokhtarian began training in BJJ and later in kick boxing. His MMA career took off by winning his first four fights by submission and won Australia Eternal Bantamweight Title on April 2016 with a 12-1 record.
Some older fights
other videos on his training routine, gym he founded (Australian top team)
Says he likes to strike 'maybe' not seen much of it from the above videos, lots of fakes and jabs and setting up his take downs (some good timed entries shown) and relies on his gnp and top control, trained bjj and striking(MT). Poor quality opponents overall.
Luke Jumeau (Fighting Dominique Steele)
11-3, 29 years old (5kos, 4subs)
-6 fight win streak
-had donations to get his medical bills sorted to fight in ufc
-passed usada test recently
-Full time job as panel beater, wife and 2 kids to support
-trains Core mma gym 4-5 times per week.
Last fight against ex-ufcs Vic
(Last few fights)
Luke more of a striker, has some nice counter boxing and good kicks but did struggle
with grapplers and his take down defence was lacking against solid wrestlers.
Stats in mma are pretty worthless. Not entirely worthless, but close. Using stats as a main way of seeing what someone's striking defense or takedown defense is is not good.
That is a ridiculous statement.
Fighting isn't that hard, you are picking fighter A over fighter B or vise versa. Try picking a winner in a race with 20 horses without a form guide (stats, numbers) and without it being random luck.
The answer is often in the numbers, MMA is no different, but the numbers don't tell us certain things that our eyes do. Like for example how in the UFC post USADA era fighter A went from being a shredded killing machine to a 38 year old man with a deflated dad bod.
He HAD a good chin. he's been KOed in his last four losses. He's also 43 years old. BB is also one of the hardest hitters in the HW division
I don't think his post is off really. The problem is how the stats are compiled. What is marked a significant strike sometimes doesn't even land. What can be considered a "takedown attempt" may just be something to set up a clinch. Don't even get me started on sub attempts. Sub attempts sometimes count for guys just throwing up their legs fishing for something that isn't there.
I feel if the stats were more reliable and consistent, then they'd hold more weight.
MMA math crew checking in..
Alvey starches Kelly with a blitz
Brunson starches Alvey with a blitz
Brunson loses to Kelly 29/28 winning the 1st
Am I doing it right ?
People still believe in Ben 10?
Really...
MMA math crew are back and after smolka mauled him on the ground
Then Elliot mauled smolka on the ground
Where we going with this one boys?
Granted Elliot is short notice and it's a helluva flight has to factor in