In what fight was Eye "severly undersized"? I've been watching her old fights a lot before betting on Chookagian-Eye, and her problem is not size (she was the same size or slightly smaller than every single person she faced at 135), but a slew of mistakes in her stand-up technique as well as generally poor/slow reactions.
Eye was not "competitive" in many of her losses, either. Miesha Tate, whose stand-up downright sucks, knocked Eye down twice with right hands and beat her up standing.
This hasn't improved much over her 2 fights at 125 earlier this year, either. She was hurt by freaking Faria in the first round of their fight, and even Rose-Clark, an almost pure grappler, was holding her own striking with Eye. Eye has slightly improved one or two of her striking mistakes, but numerous gaping holes exist.
The same Davis that beat Eye, you mean? Nevermind that Chookagian beat both Borella and Aldana, who are both equal or better fighters than Eye, too.
As I noted before, this is Eye's one path to victory. That being said, the only evidence of her wrestling is beating the awful Faria in rounds 2 and 3. And that was from the clinch, where Chookagian is fairly respectable, and her takedown defense has steadily improved.
What makes it "mediocre", exactly? The fact that she is presently less famous and well-regarded?
There are actually things Chookagian does better than Holly Holm. She holds her hands correctly, as opposed to Holm's moronic elbows pointed outwards, forearms pointed inwards towards her own face. She also circles on the outside much better, varying her direction, as opposed to Holm, who continually circles into the power.
This isn't so much that I'm a fan of Chookagian (watching her awful point-fighting exhibitions is sheer torture), but that I think it's important to value reality as opposed to hype.