No I meant Wlad.Did you mean Vitaly ?
He was champ but didn’t unify, defended 9x, which is similar to Wilder.
45 wins 41 KOs.
On paper they have some similarities.
I’d put Vitaly above Wilder though, he was a much more complete fighter- better fighter IQ, and he faced better competition, at least in terms of the top guys he beat, in my opinion.
LOL yeah nice one!!In terms of legacy, resume. Their title runs etc. would you put him on Wlad’s level?
No Wilder's resume is CLEARLY superior in every way possible.....Did Wlad fight better opposition?
and Prime Fedor would SPANK Wilder in a real fightWilder would SPANK Wlad in a real fight
Wilder would double leg Fedor like he did Fury. Fury had to bounce off the ropes just to stuff that takedown. It should've been ruled as a knockdown actually because the ropes held Fury up.and Prime Fedor would SPANK Wilder in a real fight
what does that have to dow ith anything?
LMAO. Good spot!Wilder would double leg Fedor like he did Fury. Fury had to bounce off the ropes just to stuff that takedown. It should've been ruled as a knockdown actually because the ropes held Fury up.
Wilder would double leg Fedor like he did Fury. Fury had to bounce off the ropes just to stuff that takedown. It should've been ruled as a knockdown actually because the ropes held Fury up.
assume Wlad fought more top 10 fighters at the time than Wilder?Wilder's resume isn't remotely close to Wlad's, any way you twist it.
Wlad's resume is above and beyond every other heavyweight of the last 15 years.
While Joshua and Fury may more more impressive marquee wins than Wlad, their resumes are very top-heavy with no depth.