Social Trump punks the media that said he hide in a bunker

The right to protest is superceded by the security of the President. I doubt they had a permit for that space, or Trump would have probably elected a different route.

The issue is simple; if the President wants to cross a street, he crosses the street. He goes where he pleases, when he pleases. You get out of the way.



As if he needed to do that at this time. Hardly helping the situation is it.
 
So people assembling as they are legally and constitutionally allowed to do so are "criminals?" Some of you here have drunk yourselves retarded with the Trump Kool-Aid which now comes in Tropical Fascist Flavor.

This fat man has turned America into a fascist dictatorship yet all you "maaaaah freeeeedom" crowd are okay with massive laws being broken, civils rights being ignored not just against our own citizens but foreign press as well. How are you not thoroughly disgusted by the actions of the US government and the corrupt gang of cop terrorists?


were they told to move by the police?

Did they move?

It doesn’t take a genius to figure out what happens next.
 
It was not necessary for him to go there, he went there for a photo op.

If you agree with the president's acions, as opposed to simply stating the law, then the president can curtail any protest by simply travelling through the area.


As if he needed to do that at this time. Hardly helping the situation is it.

I don't give a damn what you think is necessary or what isn't necessary. I don't care what you think is "helping".

The President goes where he pleases. Your head is so far up your ass right now between your contempt for Trump and your unbridled support for these anti-police protests that you are actually defending citizens disobeying the directives of the Secret Service and a Presidential train.
 
I don't give a damn what you think is necessary or what isn't necessary. I don't care what you think is "helping".

The President goes where he pleases. Your head is so far up your ass right now between your contempt for Trump and your unbridled support for these anti-police protests that you are actually defending citizens disobeying the directives of the Secret Service and a Presidential train.

You have really gone down hill since you became a dildo.
 
The right to protest is superceded by the security of the President. I doubt they had a permit for that space, or Trump would have probably elected a different route.

The issue is simple; if the President wants to cross a street, he crosses the street. He goes where he pleases, when he pleases. You get out of the way.

Good lord, are you servile to the extreme. The President had police use violent force on peaceful protesters in order to do a photo op he didn't even inform the church he was doing.

Security of the President, lol. He could've waved a bible like some Sinclair Lewis villain while playing the Herod role from the Oval Office, or his bitch bunker. That was a show of force by an authoritarian and you're playing some odd Grima Wormtongue shit. Odd.
 
The right to protest is superceded by the security of the President. I doubt they had a permit for that space, or Trump would have probably elected a different route.

The issue is simple; if the President wants to cross a street, he crosses the street. He goes where he pleases, when he pleases. You get out of the way.
Wow, this is a new low for you. A boot licker to the highest degree. As un-American as it gets.
 
I don't give a damn what you think is necessary or what isn't necessary. I don't care what you think is "helping".

The President goes where he pleases. Your head is so far up your ass right now between your contempt for Trump and your unbridled support for these anti-police protests that you are actually defending citizens disobeying the directives of the Secret Service and a Presidential train.
You are showing your true fascist colors and nuthugging Trump.

Nothing wrong with protesting police brutality and the system, only a bootlicker with fascist sympatheis would find it wrong to protest police brutality.

Even some police officiers are kneeling in solidarity.
 
Good lord, are you servile to the extreme. The President had police use violent force on peaceful protesters in order to do a photo op he didn't even inform the church he was doing.

Security of the President, lol. He could've waved a bible like some Sinclair Lewis villain while playing the Herod role from the Oval Office, or his bitch bunker. That was a show of force by an authoritarian and you're playing some odd Grima Wormtongue shit. Odd.
The fact you are framing this as a matter of "servility" betrays that not only have you lost your sense of proportion, but have also willfully adopted a position of rebellion-- however meek. It doesn't matter if he didn't inform the church. It doesn't matter what a crowd of people is doing. This is the United States of America, and the President will move freely wherever he pleases in its public domain. He is the chief executive of the country.

You may hate this President, but he bears the authority of the Office.
 
The fact you are framing this as a matter of "servility" betrays that not only have you lost your sense of proportion, but have also willfully adopted a position of rebellion-- however meek. It doesn't matter if he didn't inform the church. It doesn't matter what a crowd of people is doing. This is the United States of America, and the President will move freely wherever he pleases in its public domain. He is the chief executive of the country.

You may hate this President, but he bears the authority of the Office.
Where was it ever stated that a president can flashbang people who aren't breaking the law so he can do an impromptu photo op? When did the freedoms of the people mean less than the freedom of the president? That's tyranny, not Bernie fighting for healthcare as a human right.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,238,132
Messages
55,539,677
Members
174,822
Latest member
africancelary
Back
Top