- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
- Messages
- 53,973
- Reaction score
- 31,116
For sure there's cultural variation. So in Japan even today the average young person on the street is probably more likely to help a random old person who is seemingly in need than a random young person on the streets of Detroit or Chicago. But the incentive structure under capitalism will erode the traditional family structure and lead to lower birth and marriage rates which in different cultures will have different specific effects but overall still atomizes the family.I think we're talking past each other. And that's fine. I don't personally think Capitalism is the cause for the decline but, regarding your last paragraph, I'll concede that maybe the work-life balance has impacted that dynamic a bit. I still don't think capitalism alone is the reason why youngsters aren't respecting elders or their communities. There's just a lack of parentage and time spent with children that's causing that decline. I'm sure you'll opine that this is cause the parents are too busy working multiple jobs as cogs in the grand Capitalist machine, but if that's the case, I'd suggest that they not have so many fucking children in the first place (or at least delay until they're able to raise that child properly). But to each his own I suppose.
Hmm, its a potentially a chicken and egg situation. My counter would be the idea is that the capitalist structure saw feminism as useful because allowing women into the labor market would benefit the capitalist class. Expand the supply of labor to cheapen its value, similar to how many in the business class have an under the table tolerance for illegal immigration. Notice how mainstream feminism is often not the anti-capitalist kind, its often this stale corporate approved kind where the ideal of equality is that women should strive to become equally replaceable cogs in the machine("we need more women in the workforce!") or equally exploitative managers("we need more female CEOs!").This is true in many ways but none of that has to lead to a decline in the nuclear family at least to this degree. You know what you also find in liberal free markets? Feminism. The nuclear family could survive capitalism but it don't stand a chance against feminism.
I do agree that the excesses of capitalism can be reigned in by a traditional culture, that's how America was before the 60s despite its grave flaws like racial segregation. We had what Samuel Huntington called an "Anglo-Protestant" culture which didn't mean that everyone had to be an Anglo-Saxon Protestant but rather that we had a shared culture that was influenced by that tradition that people generally assimilated to even if they weren't Anglo-Saxon like the Irish and Italian Catholics or, to a lesser extent, the Jews.
But the problem is that capitalism trends towards eroding that culture and traditional families. So unless each generation is conscious of these effects and consciously tries to offset them, by emphasizing the importance of the family and of parenthood and so on, capitalism will atomize the family and erode traditional culture replacing it with this kind of globalized pop culture. As long as you can sell movie tickets or CDs and so on you're a "winner" under capitalism even if you're peddling the most degenerate filth.
Last edited: