- leg locks make a big difference. They seem to be a big equalizer which someone pointed out.
I did actually.
For the rest I posted these videos because someone mentioned specifically Elizabeth Clay in a pure BJJ setting, and the thread is about pure BJJ.
In MMA/self defense you obviously need to behave differently, and like said i think that in MMA/real fight for a woman winning is much harder than in pure BJJ, but still easier than in Judo or Wrestling.
I think part of this is the way sport BJJ has evolved. Fair play to her she got the tap but it just shows me how far sport BJJ has deviated from reality and other grappling styles. Even catch was always pin or submission which was to maintain the importance of top position for bridging to fighting.
I think pin rules are by far the most unrealistic ruleset while at the same time being the one where strenght and athleticism matter most.
Back in the old days the Gracie's (and many other BJJ fighters too) showed that you can be forced on the bottom against a much stronger but much less skilled and experienced opponent and still be the one in control of the fight, neutralize strikes and fuck them up.
I agree with you that training only sport BJJ doesn't traslate well to that however, you need to train also self defense BJJ or MMA to be able to pull it off reliably.
It's true that pure sport BJJ today has deviated a lot from real fighting, altough I don't find other grappling sports much more more realistic, pin rules are unrealistic as it gets in my opinion and Judo leg takedowns ban is massively unrealistic too.
Sports where you willingly go to your belly and give your back and where you lose if your are pinned in ways that doesn't allow the opponent to strike you without letting you escape are also far from real combat.
And any other format of fighting/MMA/Judo/Wrestling it's not like that either and I still see a strong guy with minimal training as giving any elite female grappler a very hard time.
My opinion is that in MMA/real fights an high level female grappler who is very well rounded (so she is good at takedowns, at ground fighting and knows leg locks) and who has trained dealing with strikes is going to reliably beat even much bigger and stronger guys who have minimal training, unless the size difference is truly gigantic.
It would not be a walk in the park nor an easy and guaranteed victory (so yeah, she still would have trouble, like Rorion said), but she should still win most of the time.
If she is a guard puller/butt scooter with little takedown skills and who has never even tought about strikes management then yeah, she is very likely going to lose badly.
If however the much bigger and stronger guy is completely untrained and clueless, instead of having some training, she is probably going to still pull it off even if she has holes in her game.
If the much bigger and stronger guy is also a competent grappler (eg. solid blue belt level) then he is very likely going to destroy her.
Also we should keep in mind that, like men, not all high level female grapplers are the same strenght and athleticism wise, there are huge individual differences between them too.
Letting aside genetic anomaly such as Gabi Garcia, there is a shiton of difference between a 150-160 lbs elite female grappler and a 100-110 lbs one.
An athletic 160 lbs one may be able to easily beat a very big and strong guy who is too much for a 110 lbs one, despite not being more skilled than the other girl.