Who gets the to decide what the consequence is?
You?
Or some other porridge-ass, blue-haired pansy that doesn't have the emotional intelligence to deal with any view that isn't their own?
Has it ever occurred to you that the people who are "deciding what the consequences are" for people who say what they don't agree with, are the very last people in the world who should make that decision?
People who believe anti-vax shit and any other horse-shit conspiracy has a right to state their beliefs without getting harrassed by bloodclot cowards who think they own the moral high-ground. If it's horse-shit then it should be easy to debunk. But in the spirit of eternal bitch-ass-motherfuckery your default setting is anonymous bullying and whining. There is legal machinery in place if she said something illegal. But she didn't.
This shit will backfire one day. I guarantee it.
she said her experience as a conspiracy wingnut was akin to the experience of Jews in nazi Germany
and you think the people who disagree with her are the ones that lack 'emotional intelligence'? or that they disagree with her because her view isn't their own
using the anti-vax example, it was literally started as a hoax, and has been denounced and debunked ever since
yet, i would guess that, today more people buy into than ever
it is easy to debunk, but that has no effect on those who are prone to conspiracy reasoning - their position isn't based on evidence in the first place, evidence is not likely to dissuade them
anti-vax beliefs have consequences for other people that don't endorse them, why should they not have consequences for the people that do
de-platforming does work in terms of combating hate-speech and the spread of misinformation, though it's not the ultimate, long-term solution
allowing extremist views and the like to exist free from criticism and consequence is part of a deliberate effort to legitimise them - which is actually a tactic the nazis used
if you spout this shit out in the open, SOME people might not like you for it - big fucking deal - this is not empowering 'blue-haried pansies' (a blatantly disingenuous caricature that serves as a straw man) to decide what the consequences are
if you spout enough shit, there MIGHT be follow on consequences - but i don't think for a second that disney, twitter and all these other mega-corporations actually give a shit, they just don't want to lose money
if these people think they are victims of a new Holocaust because of this, then they can fuck off directly into the sun for all i care
actions have consequences. consequences are not always appropriate or proportionate - but nothing she's 'suffered' validates her ridiculous claims of victimisation
if you want to be a cunt, but don't want to face any consequences for it, you are free to be a cunt in private
Jews could do nothing to avoid the consequences for having the audacity to exist in an era of genocidal antisemitism