Social Kyle Rittenhouse updates

If he didn't have the rifle he would never have gone there. It's too dangerous.

If dudes like you could spare half of the contempt you have for a misguided kid who thought he was doing the right thing and spread it around to the people who were committing real crimes like looting and burning, one of them a multiple time sex offender, you might not come off like such retards.
 
Isn't that exactly what they did on 9/11¿
Worried about the Taliban coming across the ocean to get you bro? Maybe see a counsellor.

Did Kyle end up in jail or is this dumpster fire still raging?

Also, what happened to Stan, Cartman and, most importantly, Kenny?
 
So the rifle that the US military has been using for it's assault teams for the last 60 years is not an "assault rifle?" LOL

F**king derp. This is the straight cringe. LOL @ "assault teams". WTF does that even mean? No, it isn't an "assault weapon" it's literally no different than any other semi automatic rifle on the planet.

The only difference between a civilian AR and a military M-16 is the lack of select-fire (full auto). Removing this does not change what the gun is designed for, in fact soldiers are trained to rarely use full-auto as it wastes ammo and is inaccurate.

There is no difference between a "military AR" and any other rifle on the market.
 
So the rifle that the US military has been using for it's assault teams for the last 60 years is not an "assault rifle?" LOL

The only difference between a civilian AR and a military M-16 is the lack of select-fire (full auto). Removing this does not change what the gun is designed for, in fact soldiers are trained to rarely use full-auto as it wastes ammo and is inaccurate.

All guns are designed to shoot bullets and kill things. Is there something more sinister about a gun than your assault knife in your kitchen?
 
Protesters were there. He went there specifically to counter them. He also knew it was so dangerous he'd have to carry a rifle to be there. If he had to kill then so be it.

By "counter" you mean render first aid to the ones injured by police? Funny way of putting it.

Or do you mean standing guard to prevent private property from being vandalized, looted, and burned is counter-protesting? If so, all protests should be countered, don't you think?
 
Protesters were there. He went there specifically to counter them. He also knew it was so dangerous he'd have to carry a rifle to be there. If he had to kill then so be it.
At what point does a protest turn into a riot?

Do you think anyone would waste their time guarding property at a protest?

Yeah, that's a circular argument, just like "he shouldn't have been there".
 
Every American on the planet having an AR-15 would have had exactly ZERO effect on 9/11, and the terrorists didn't fire a single shot.
However one teen having an AR-15 had a huge effect in this case.
 
However one teen having an AR-15 had a huge effect in this case.

Probably kept him alive.

I'm not very convinced by the argument that if Rittenhouse wasn't there that night everyone would have gotten out alive, either.

Rosenbaum, a violent sex offender with a history of unprovoked assaults and serious mental health issue, had just been released from a mental health institution where he had ended up after making attempts on his own life and violently attacking and body slamming his girlfriend. Initially he had no intention of going to downtown Kenosha that night. He ended up there because after calling his girlfriend and asking to come over she refused and reminded him of the no contact order against him. That's when he decided to wade into the chaos, clearly agitated, shouting the N word repeatedly at the top of his voice at a BLM protest, confronting armed men, and literally asking them to shoot him.

To pretend that Rittenhouse was the catalyst of all that happened that night, given that context, is entirely a bad faith argument.

Rosenbaum was a loose canon. Had Rittenhouse not been there, there's a very good chance that it would have been someone else and also a very good chance that things wouldn't have ended until Rosenbaum had either harmed someone badly, or killed them, or been harmed badly or killed himself.
 
If dudes like you could spare half of the contempt you have for a misguided kid who thought he was doing the right thing and spread it around to the people who were committing real crimes like looting and burning, one of them a multiple time sex offender, you might not come off like such retards.


Charles Manson thought he was doing the right thing too. His mindset was pretty clear. He got strapped AF and went out after curfew to confront rioters.
 
Probably kept him alive.

I'm not very convinced by the argument that if Rittenhouse wasn't there that night everyone would have gotten out alive, either.

Rosenbaum, a violent sex offender with a history of unprovoked assaults and serious mental health issue, had just been released from a mental health institution where he had ended up after making attempts on his own life and violently attacking and body slamming his girlfriend. Initially he had no intention of going to downtown Kenosha that night. He ended up there because after calling his girlfriend and asking to come over she refused and reminded him of the no contact order against him. That's when he decided to wade into the chaos, clearly agitated, shouting the N word repeatedly at the top of his voice at a BLM protest, confronting armed men, and literally asking them to shoot him.

To pretend that Rittenhouse was the catalyst of all that happened that night, given that context, is entirely a bad faith argument.

Rosenbaum was a loose canon. Had Rittenhouse not been there, there's a very good chance that it would have been someone else and also a very good chance that things wouldn't have ended until Rosenbaum had either harmed someone badly, or killed them, or been harmed badly or killed himself.

Yep, they want to blame the kid running for his life because he’s out past curfew and carrying a gun at 17 instead of the violent pedophile that set this whole thing off. Seems fair
 
Charles Manson thought he was doing the right thing too. His mindset was pretty clear. He got strapped AF and went out after curfew to confront rioters.

They were all out against curfew. All of them. There was a city wide curfew at 2000 hrs or sometime close to that. No one heeded it. Quit harping on the curfew-no one fucking cares about the curfew. People barely care about the 17 with a gun that he wielded better than most military vets I know. He took out three people trying to cause him grievous bodily harm or worse or they tried to take his weapon which was his lifeline. Every single one of those shots that he fired was justified. But the prosecutors even charged him for a bullet that missed pedo boy and skipped off the ground near the witness. That’s how weak their case is. “Well, he was being chased and attacked by a raging asshole and his missed a shot that almost hit someone, we should charge him for that as well as three trumped up charges of murder/attempted
Murder”
 
Yep, they want to blame the kid running for his life because he’s out past curfew and carrying a gun at 17 instead of the violent pedophile that set this whole thing off. Seems fair

Trying to deter arson is morally repugnant to some. People should rely on the cops (who let crime run wild the previous couple nights) to keep property save from rioters.
 
Back
Top