- Joined
- Oct 6, 2004
- Messages
- 43,058
- Reaction score
- 13,054
It gets worse: NZ police wanted to charge him under the Terrorism Prevention Act when they believed him to be planning a terror attack. But the case was dismissed by a judge who ruled that just planning an attack did not break the law.
Yeah, although to be fair New Zealand at least avoided the sort of hyper-legislation we had in Oz in the wake of 911. They were passing a new anti-terrorism law here on average every 7 weeks for over a decade.
They can literally arrest you in Oz for having "things connected to a terrorist act" (even if no act took place). You know... just to be really specific.
Cases like this are the flip side of that of course.