First, we were complaining there weren't enough 10-8s, and you would rarely see them. a guy would almost have to be killed before they handed one out.
Now, because your preferred fighter lost, people are complaining.
I wanted Aljo to lose, but got no problem with giving him a 10-8, for this simple logical reason - look at the other rounds, such as round 1. Round 1 is a 10-9, for whomever you scored it for (which is a different debate, the point here, is the score itself). You can't possibly argue that Round 2 was so much more dominant than Round 1. Of course it was! Not even close. Despite the apparent "lack of damage" - similar trait to Round 1, that is key here - there was clear one-sided dominance for pretty much the entire round. One fighter was on offence the entire time, while the other was defensive the entire time, fending off submission which was a threat the entire time.
Lets not go back to the old days, just because Aljo won. C'mon. We argued for years for them to be more liberal with the 10-8's, so let's not let the filthy casuals regress the scoring.