Social GoldenWolf's COVID Vaccine/Lockdown Protest megathread

Is this reasonable? or a slippery slope?


  • Total voters
    366
Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe consider looking into your "fact" check sources and their payed for bias. Its a shame you didn't also use rooters, always gold when they use that rag and its ceo as a source of "fact"

You can do it, an intellectual disability like an acquired brain injury can be overcome with hard work and effort.
Maybe use a source that isn't a fucking blog if you want me to take anything you say seriously.
 
Maybe use a source that isn't a fucking blog if you want me to take anything you say seriously.


Lol touched on a nerve hey. Think about why I use blogs, you can do it little zee

Thats right the blogs supply the government data and also an analysis that USUALLY mirrors mine. I.e. the two statistician- Joel Smalley and Norman Fenton.

The journalists like Naomi Wolf had supplied the downloadable pfizer docs .

The epidemiologists gave his very very very experienced professional opinion. In simple terms for you to understand i.e. His opinions
- Should have used an inactivated vaccine, - - - The censorship of seriously injured is a travesty (daughter and son in law).
- The fraud in regards to ivermectin.
- The lack of knowledge, understanding and ability of the Chief Health Officers etc that are making policy
- Disagreed with Geert Vanden Bosche but Geert rebutted so its a draw


Edit- sorry, as you can guess i have fat fingers and while I believe I'm pressing one button I'm getting another.



Once again I highly recommend this video as the little german doctor clearly explains the mechanisms of harm in which may be causing brain damage.

https://rumble.com/v1vdq72-dr-reine...ly-changed-personality-changes-after-mrn.html


- Have you noticed any changes in your cognitive abilities? (I vaguely remember you not being so basic in your reasoning over the years)
- Do you find that you lack empathy for others and the pain and anguish of the vaxx injured irritates you more then makes you feel their pain.
- Do you get urges to lick the windows when on the bus or to manufacture lollys?
 
Last edited:
Lol touched on a nerve hey. Think about why I use blogs, you can do it little zee

Thats right the blogs supply the government data and also an analysis that USUALLY mirrors mine. I.e. the two statistician- Joel Smalley and Norman Fenton.

The journalists like Naomi Wolf had supplied the downloadable pfizer docs .

The epidemiologists gave his very very very experienced professional opinion. In simple terms for you to understand i.e. His opinions
- Should have used an inactivated vaccine, - The censorship of seriously injured is a travesty (daughter and son in law).
- The fraud in regards to ivermectin.
- The lack of knowledge, understanding and ability of the Chief Health Officers etc that are making policy
- Disagreed with Geert Vanden Bosche but Geert rebutted so its a draw
-
Spoiler Alert: Blogs don't have fact-checking. The "data" they are using could be completely fabricated, or at the very least dramatically misinterpreted.

Share a source that isn't a blog.

I dare you.
 
Spoiler Alert: Blogs don't have fact-checking. The "data" they are using could be completely fabricated, or at the very least dramatically misinterpreted.

Share a source that isn't a blog.

I dare you.

He's reading hand picked blogs that use the same hand picked resources he uses, in order that the blogs perfectly align with his own fantasy.
 
Spoiler Alert: Blogs don't have fact-checking. The "data" they are using could be completely fabricated, or at the very least dramatically misinterpreted.

Share a source that isn't a blog.

I dare you.


This is always the way of the intellectually dishonest.
They want this, I supply it, they want that I spoon feed them that. That gets ignored etc etc etc etc etc

They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius by-

"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius"




Please see above because we have a pattern and I'd be the fool to keep supplying you information to have it ignored.

Earlier in the thread I posted a how to use the TGA search ability for (reported) vaccine injuries, I've supplied government data from government websites and this was my answer

"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius"

Very early in the thread i supplied Data and stats and

"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius"


Do you see a pattern? Because I do. I initially treated you as a person that was reasonable and had the possibility of critical thought so I jumped through your hoops and a million replies of garbage. BUT

"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius"

As you can see above unfortunately you aren't special, different or unique, as you are using the same intellectual dishonesty that has been displayed for 1700 pages. The others have started to, or have realised that something is very wrong or doesn't add up. In fairness you are potentially brain damaged (literally) and perhaps unable to learn something new or are slow to learn.


People with Alzheimer's and the like write down notes on cards and keep them with them to remind them of important things....

"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius.


Just saying
 
Last edited:
This is always the way of the intellectually dishonest.
They want this, I supply it, they want that I spoon feed them that. That gets ignored etc etc etc etc etc

They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius by
"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius"


Please see above because we have a pattern and I'd be the fool to keep supplying you information to have it ignored.

Earlier in the thread I posted a how to use the TGA search ability for (reported) vaccine injuries, I've supplied government data from government websites and this was my answer

"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius"

Very early in the thread i supplied Data and stats and

"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius"


Do you see a pattern? Because I do. I initially treated you as a person that was reasonable and had the possibility of critical thought so I jumped through your hoops and a million replies if garbage. BUT

"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius"

As you can see above unfortunately you aren't special, different or unique, as you are using the same intellectual dishonesty that has been displayed for 1700 pages. The others have started to, or have realised that something is very wrong or doesn't add up. In faurness you are potentially brain damaged (literally) and are unable to learn something new.


People with Alzheimer's and the like write down notes on cards and keep them with them to remind them of important things....

"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius.


Just saying
All I want is verifiable facts from a legitimate source.

You have yet to provide any.
 
He's reading hand picked blogs that use the same hand picked resources he uses, in order that the blogs perfectly align with his own fantasy.
I keep trying to get through to him, but I think it might be hopeless.
 
All I want is verifiable facts from a legitimate source.

You have yet to provide any.


Sigh, really just a post for the lurkers

"Emeritus Professor Robert Clancy AM, MBBS(Hons), BSc(Med), PhD, DSc, FRACP, FRCPA, FRS(N) is a practising clinical immunologist with an international reputation for research in autoimmune disease, immunisation and mucosal inflammatory disease. He was Foundation Professor of Pathology at the University of Newcastle, where he established the Newcastle Mucosal Immunology Group, identifying mechanisms of airways protection and the pathogenesis of mucosal disease, and discovered new methods of disease control. He was awarded the first and only Doctor of Science by The University of Newcastle.

Professor Clancy developed the vaccine Broncostat at the University of Newcastle in 1985. The Broncostat vaccine reduces attacks of acute bronchitis to a degree of 90%.
"



The Australian data

https://apps.tga.gov.au/PROD/DAEN/daen-report.aspx

"Database of Adverse Event Notifications - medicines"



Now while correlation isnt causation it us a sign that potentially it is a causal relationship, more so with the notorious under reporting that is internationally recognised problem.

I.e.
https://12bytes.org/the-lazarus-report/
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-under-reporting-factor-in-vaers
https://vaersanalysis.info/2022/10/...-by-way-of-the-recently-released-v-safe-data/
https://www.conservativereview.com/...11-18&utm_term=ACTIVE - Weekly Daily Combined

Horowitz- 23, Rose- 41, VAERS analysis- 60 using V-Safe data for adverse events and the Lazarus report estimated 100 a decade or so ago.

So look at he injuries, multiply them and thats the potential injuries that have gone unreported. It is very believable because the disease source of the WHO had raised how much a problem this was .


The German pathologist proved that over 99% of the bodies he did autopsys on were definitely vaxxine damage caused. Dr Ryan Cole in America is also doing tests to prove causation for the families that doubt the narrative i.e. climate change, unknown causes,
 
Sigh, really just a post for the lurkers

"Emeritus Professor Robert Clancy AM, MBBS(Hons), BSc(Med), PhD, DSc, FRACP, FRCPA, FRS(N) is a practising clinical immunologist with an international reputation for research in autoimmune disease, immunisation and mucosal inflammatory disease. He was Foundation Professor of Pathology at the University of Newcastle, where he established the Newcastle Mucosal Immunology Group, identifying mechanisms of airways protection and the pathogenesis of mucosal disease, and discovered new methods of disease control. He was awarded the first and only Doctor of Science by The University of Newcastle.

Professor Clancy developed the vaccine Broncostat at the University of Newcastle in 1985. The Broncostat vaccine reduces attacks of acute bronchitis to a degree of 90%.
"



The Australian data

https://apps.tga.gov.au/PROD/DAEN/daen-report.aspx

"Database of Adverse Event Notifications - medicines"



Now while correlation isnt causation it us a sign that potentially it is a causal relationship, more so with the notorious under reporting that is internationally recognised problem.

I.e.
https://12bytes.org/the-lazarus-report/
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-under-reporting-factor-in-vaers
https://vaersanalysis.info/2022/10/...-by-way-of-the-recently-released-v-safe-data/
https://www.conservativereview.com/horowitz-cdc-data-shows-vaers-is-the-tip-of-vaccine-injury-iceberg-2658689415.html?utm_source=cr-weekly&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CR Weekly 2022-11-18&utm_term=ACTIVE - Weekly Daily Combined

Horowitz- 23, Rose- 41, VAERS analysis- 60 using V-Safe data for adverse events and the Lazarus report estimated 100 a decade or so ago.

So look at he injuries, multiply them and thats the potential injuries that have gone unreported. It is very believable because the disease source of the WHO had raised how much a problem this was .


The German pathologist proved that over 99% of the bodies he did autopsys on were definitely vaxxine damage caused. Dr Ryan Cole in America is also doing tests to prove causation for the families that doubt the narrative i.e. climate change, unknown causes,
I ask for non-blog souces.

You post four blogs.

Jesus Christ dude.
 
I ask for non-blog souces.

You post four blogs.

Jesus Christ dude.


"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius"

You're almost at the lurking stage ....

Can you imagine being do wilfully blind as to completely and utterly ignore the facts and links that prove your last diversion, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius"


Every single person on the planet that understands drug side effect reporting understands the under reporting problem.

Tbh Albert Benavides who has analyzed hospital data for decades has been following and evaluating the VAERs data is probably the world expert. But in saying that I'm wasting my time i.e. whether retardation or trolling it is worthless besides the lurkers I may get to stop and think


Welcometheeagle. Or welcomtheeagle88

https://www.occupyhealth.com/albert-benavides-looking-at-vaers-data/
 


You used Bill Gates funded websites to fact check Bill Gates. LoL.


LoLololol


Vaccines mean people have less kids! Why, because less kids die?

Protip: dead kids don't increase population either.

<36>
 
You used Bill Gates funded websites to fact check Bill Gates. LoL.


LoLololol


Vaccines mean people have less kids! Why, because less kids die?

Protip: dead kids don't increase population either.

<36>


Its like the morons quoting rooters. Rooters owns the "factchecking" company they use to prove safe and effective. The ceo of this "independent" "reputable" fact checking company is a board member on the Pfizer board, you literally couldn't make this shit up if you tried.


Seriously, how many times has the below played out.
"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius"

They ask for something and when you give it to them, then posts move.

AND/OR they face away like above and demand something else while completely and brazenly ignoring your rebuttal.

AND/OR they attack anything but what they demanded in the first place.


Lmfao the hide "you haven't supplied one credible expert" so you highlight that you have infact given a very very credible.

"Emeritus Professor Robert Clancy AM, MBBS(Hons), BSc(Med), PhD, DSc, FRACP, FRCPA, FRS(N) is a practising clinical immunologist with an international reputation for research in autoimmune disease, immunisation and mucosal inflammatory disease. He was Foundation Professor of Pathology at the University of Newcastle, where he established the Newcastle Mucosal Immunology Group, identifying mechanisms of airways protection and the pathogenesis of mucosal disease, and discovered new methods of disease control. He was awarded the first and only Doctor of Science by The University of Newcastle.

Professor Clancy developed the vaccine Broncostat at the University of Newcastle in 1985. The Broncostat vaccine reduces attacks of acute bronchitis to a degree of 90%.
."


This is the same imbecile that said he is not qualified to have an opinion, what do you do with that?
 
You used Bill Gates funded websites to fact check Bill Gates. LoL.


LoLololol


Vaccines mean people have less kids! Why, because less kids die?

Protip: dead kids don't increase population either.

<36>
If you bothered to read any of the links you would see why the clip is taken entirely out of context.

It's actually ridiculous that anyone believes that he was talking about population control.

Like, embarrassingly stupid.
 
The problem with this thread is dealing with all the simpletons who don't realize how dumb they are.
 
This is the same imbecile that said he is not qualified to have an opinion, what do you do with that?
Lol neither are you, and that's painfully obvious.

The difference is that I can at least admit that I'm not qualified to accurately interpret the raw data.

Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for you to post a source that isn't a blog.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top