Spoiler Alert: Blogs don't have fact-checking. The "data" they are using could be completely fabricated, or at the very least dramatically misinterpreted.
Share a source that isn't a blog.
I dare you.
This is always the way of the intellectually dishonest.
They want this, I supply it, they want that I spoon feed them that. That gets ignored etc etc etc etc etc
They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius by-
"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius"
Please see above because we have a pattern and I'd be the fool to keep supplying you information to have it ignored.
Earlier in the thread I posted a how to use the TGA search ability for (reported) vaccine injuries, I've supplied government data from government websites and this was my answer
"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius"
Very early in the thread i supplied Data and stats and
"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius"
Do you see a pattern? Because I do. I initially treated you as a person that was reasonable and had the possibility of critical thought so I jumped through your hoops and a million replies of garbage. BUT
"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius"
As you can see above unfortunately you aren't special, different or unique, as you are using the same intellectual dishonesty that has been displayed for 1700 pages. The others have started to, or have realised that something is very wrong or doesn't add up. In fairness you are potentially brain damaged (literally) and perhaps unable to learn something new or are slow to learn.
People with Alzheimer's and the like write down notes on cards and keep them with them to remind them of important things....
"They/you divert, twist, turn, weasel and after attacking the format, source, person they disappear for a small chapter or two while bitterly lurking waiting for a moment they can pull down the whole house of cards and display their intellectual genius.
Just saying