The guy's message isn't exactly my cup of tea, but do either of you actually have a significant argument against what he's saying? Particularly for Loiosh, what about that makes you think this makes him sound like he's "going to be the next shooter"? What about it was "psychotic"? Again, the content wasn't my cup of tea, but this just sounds like ad hominem dismissal, and utterly devoid of actual critique. Hell, Loiosh's second paragraph seems to be straw manning an argument rather than dealing with what's actually there. I see others attempting to offer critique, but not you two. Particularly given Loiosh's history of coming into threads and just declaring people racist, it puts the quality, or perhaps good faith honesty, of his assessments into question. Care to elaborate on what you've said?