- Joined
- May 14, 2004
- Messages
- 9,360
- Reaction score
- 5,312
That wasn't what I was implying.
Do you think the year is 1840? The US imports about 30% of its vegetables and about half of its fruit. There are plenty of island nations that don't have sprawling farm land and wildlife.
I'm not making an argument for what is better, I'm just shutting down this argument that their only choice is whale and dolphin or they starve to death. They aren't some tribal island that is disconnected from the rest of the modern world. They are not just subsiding on dolphin sandwiches, dolphin casserole, and sauted dolphin blubber. But that's a separate argument altogether.
You're trying to read into more than what I am presently arguing.
We are talking about this particular day where they killed 1,500. If they didn't have enough people to hunt, how could they have enough people to process?
And I am curious if you found something that talked about their eating habits.
In something I read, it doesnt seem to be what you said. Granted, the information is dated. And when I checked the official site, they don't have this particular information there anymore.
https://seashepherd.org/2014/06/27/why-are-whales-and-dolphins-killed-in-the-faroe-islands/
https://www.whaling.fo/en/q-a/
I'm not seeing how they are avoiding damage from mercury if all they've been eating is whale and dolphin for the past few generations.
If there are dolphins and whales in the water, then there are also fish and other seafood.
You keep trying to tie this practice in to some form of tribal barbarism but cannot, outside of your suspicion of wastefulness, articulate why it's bad practice. We have hundreds of years of history telling us how these people live off of the land in what way it manifests itself in their cuisine. There is no mystery here. These people literally live off of whale meat.
Take this from the faroeislands website:
Here is an example of this:Due to the climate-based limitations to agriculture and technological limitations to fishing, the art of survival was a challenge to the first many generations of Faroese people. It was a struggle to obtain enough in terms of both quantity and quality of nutrients. As a result, the Faroese learned to utilize every bit of every fish caught, every mammal slaughtered, and every bird netted. In addition to putting every part of their catch to good use, they also tried to store as much as possible for hard times.
aged whale meat, aged sheep leg (?), blubber and what seems to be fermented fish. You know when you go to a get together and you see a charcuterie board with aged meats and cheese? Well this is what the Faroese are offering.
The fact that they didn't have enough people to hunt probably coincides with the fact that it was a historically unprecedented amount of whales that washed ashore. Do you think they know exactly how many whales are going to present themselves every year? This isn't an exact science. They keep records of it every year so generally speaking they have a rough estimation but it isn't outside the realm of possibility that they didn't realize the vast quantities they were dealing with on this particular day.
Your primary argument = It's probably wasteful. No it probably isn't, these people literally consume the entirety of the animal and age the meat. The blubber is consumed as a snack and as a cooking oil at times. Fermented meat is also a big part of Faroese cuisine . It's not unsustainable, It's not some outdated tribalism either. It also is not unethical nor cruel. This is called hunting and a lot of urban folk unintelligibly take issue with it.
Also what you read was from the sea shepherd. These people are some of the biggest opponents of the grind and often present it the way you do. As some unintelligible outdated practice. Their primary arguments aren't even based on wastefullness like yours but rather that it doesn't need to happen in the first place. The cite the fact that it's a delicacy and not a necessity. So what? Are we to stop eating anything that is considered a delicacy because we don't have to anymore? They also talk about Mercury which in all faireness is the greatest argument they have. It is worrisome that it's as toxic as it is but is it really a good enough argument to get them to stop the practice?
Here's a video featuring the Faroese and the sea shepherds concerning the grind.
In short there really isn't much of an argument besides the mercury levels. Outside of that any appeal to tribalism or cruelty or unsustainability isn't based on anything other than some irrational perception of people hunting cute dolphins/whales.