It’s a fairy tale just like man made religion...Sorry, I'm a bit confused by this. What part of climate change is a religion?
It’s a fairy tale just like man made religion...Sorry, I'm a bit confused by this. What part of climate change is a religion?
The entire thing. An inconvenient truth is just the book of revelations. We're all climate sinners who need to confess and repent to avoid hellfire.
People are inherently religious, so getting rid of traditional religion leaves a nice big hole to fill and we already have the template.
I saw a YouTube interview. And a guy said that the UN and governments give 2 billion dollars a year to scientists to research that Climate Change is because of humans.
I think that UN and governments believe that Climate Change is because of humans. And they give a lot of money to scientist to verify their beliefs. But that is not falsifiability.
And also, the scientist then also have an incentive to prove that Climate Change is done because of humans. So, that also seems wrong. Scientist should have the incentive to find the truth. They should chase the truth.
I am scientific illiterate. So, I could be wrong.
@djacobox372
Edit (a poster in this thread wants me to post the video of the YouTube guy in the OP)
So, here is the video of the interview.
And people will use any excuse to continue to pollute the earth.And just like coronavirus, the alarm has been ramped up inordinately to cram down solutions that have done more damage than the thing they were supposed to solve, and still didn't work. Good example. In climate utopia, every year could be like 2020. Dare to dream.
Evidence of what? The climate changing? Sure there is, but there's an inverse relationship between how catastrophic the claims and the efficacy of religious devotion and rituals, to the evidence that supports it. The "models" are only as good as the person entering the info, and it pays to err on the side of panic, which why models for anything are literally always miles off and only in the direction of panic.You don't think there's much evidence of it?
Evidence of what? The climate changing? Sure there is, but there's an inverse relationship between how catastrophic the claims and the efficacy of religious devotion and rituals, to the evidence that supports it. The "models" are only as good as the person entering the info, and it pays to err on the side of panic, which why models for anything are literally always miles off and only in the direction of panic.
Banks still offer 30 year mortgages on beachfront property, insurance still insures them, and coincidentally, all the religious figures of the climate religion happen to be the ones buying them. Much like many mega church hucksters, it seems their concerns melt away when it comes to their own wealth and comfort.
Are the polar bears dead yet
Summer lasted 4 weeks in the UK this year man, let that sink inAre we underwater
Are the polar bears dead yet
Is winter shorter now
Have the endless droughts moved in
Has the co2 swamped the air
Why did they change it from 2012? The Malaysians or whatever can't get shit rightIs the world ending in 11 years still?
“Malaysians”Why did they change it from 2012? The Malaysians or whatever can't get shit right
I think nearly everyone outside of Asia is on board with conservation and against throwing shit into the ocean. The conservation is to varying degrees based on the extent of damage and what's gotten in return. For example, minimal damage can be excused if it's for something massively beneficial, and less excusable the more damage is done and the more arbitrary it seems.Fair enough, I think my environmental panic is more to do with easily quantifiable things like the destruction of the Amazon or the Great Barrier Reef or the amount of plastic in oceans. I think that by focusing the environmental issues on climate change, we might be missing a trick to get people to try and make a difference.
Two weeks if you hit the covid threads or msm news...Is the world ending in 11 years still?
"Climate change isn't real because...because...uh...because scientists have funding! Yeah thats right! Climate change doesn't exist because scientists have funding! Gotcha lib!"2 billion? Even if that were true, how much do you think Big Oil and oil dependent states give out to say that is isn't? I'm sure the number is mind boggling. The fact there are even so many people on board already is a miracle.
I do not know how the climate works, but the earth is more than 4 billion years old. And before there where humans on earth the climate was also changing.
So, are humans really changing the climate or have a big impact on it?
Before humans used oil on a large scale. There were also ice ages and periods of warm temperature.
I think nearly everyone outside of Asia is on board with conservation and against throwing shit into the ocean. The conservation is to varying degrees based on the extent of damage and what's gotten in return. For example, minimal damage can be excused if it's for something massively beneficial, and less excusable the more damage is done and the more arbitrary it seems.
Would be nice if we could have the conversation there instead of skipping 10 steps and going straight to the universe is going to explode 7 years ago if we don't all buy a prius, purchase carbon credits, add a bunch of taxes and turn into vegans. I much prefer the outdoors and rural areas to big dirty cities, so someone like me is much more conservational than the jet setter activists, but when it's turned into a political matter and they tell me we have to spend more money to use less, and the people telling us that continue to get richer by making demands that we become poorer, I'm afraid they've overplayed their hand and at that point are just taking advantage of people's good nature.