- Joined
- Nov 23, 2019
- Messages
- 31,522
- Reaction score
- 65,519
You guys are still thinking about rankings and this and that. Who were the best guys in the world? And let’s not even get stuck on 2009, either. Look at the following years.
The game had obviously changed and was evolving. We know who the best in the world were around that time, and it damn sure wasn’t brock or the guys he beat in title fights. Those were the guys in fedor’s class, but that’s the point. That class of guys were no longer the best.
As I understand it (and I watched some of this “debate with DC” video last night), the debate centered around this question:Except dc was talking about how fedor stacked up against the best fighters in the ufc during that time period. Not sure why it’s so controversial. Again, he was losing 3 straight during that period.
If you want to argue fedor could have won with the right matchups that’s fine (and possible) but that wasn’t the point dc was making. Just that he wasn’t at the top of the food chain anymore.
“How would Fedor have done in the UFC, if he had arrived in 2009?”
And the answer is: Fedor would have gotten an immediate TS. Champ was Brock, whom DC concedes would lose to Fedor. Ok, now Fedor is champ. Who does he defend against first? Cain? JDS?
Nope, not in 2009. Fedor would be fighting Mir, Arlovski (I assume if Fedor isn’t in Afflcition in ‘09, neither is Andrei), Nog, etc.
Now, eventually JDS and Cain work their way up the ranks, and let’s pretend DC is right and Fedor loses those, in late 2010 (Cain earned his TS in Oct 2010) and 2011.
You guys act like I’m cherry picking fights for Fedor, but I’m not. The answer to the question of how Fedor would’ve done, is very well for all of 2009 and almost all of 2010. Then it gets dicey.