- Joined
- Apr 13, 2007
- Messages
- 29,958
- Reaction score
- 6,250
Trully scary, as you would have thought the germans would avoid authoritarian behavour like this, that they would have learned from the Nazis.
This was what the author of the piece above on Germany wrote for her article on October 9th….Great website, F'kin lol.
Another great bit of journalism by the totally objective author:Fake News: The Top 5 Anti-Israel Alternative News Sources | HonestReporting
The top five alternative news sources for negative and downright hateful coverage of Israel, Jews and the Middle East.honestreporting.com
We must all mourn Ibrahim Al-Nabulsi, the ‘Lion of Nablus’
We must take a stand and mourn all Palestinians, including those who dared to fight.mondoweiss.net
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...-of-mass-graves-at-gaza-hospitals/ar-AA1nBud1Analysts debunk Hamas claims that Israel dug mass graves at Nasser hospital
Hamas had claimed Israel dug the graves to "hide" evidence. Independent analysis found the graves were dug before the IDF arrived.m.jpost.com
Good article.
Well, Gaza has a population of about 2.4 million. And let’s say so far about 30k have died. So Israel still has about 99% of the population to go before we know for sure if that’s true or not.
figures are probably closer to 40-45 k, 80 k injured in 6 months.
So even if it’s 40k, that means Israel’s on pace to complete this “genocide” in about 30 years assuming zero children are born in that span.
Fwiw, I’m not pro Israel, but rather against people just throwing out extreme words like Genocide, Nazi and antisemitism. It’s a lopsided war between two entities that hate each other due to 70+ years of conflict.
In 1948, the United Nations Genocide Convention defined genocide as any of five "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group". These five acts were: killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children out of the group. Victims are targeted because of their real or perceived membership of a group, not randomly“So even if it’s 40k, that means Israel’s on pace to complete this “genocide” in about 30 years assuming zero children are born in that span.
Fwiw, I’m not pro Israel, but rather against people just throwing out extreme words like Genocide, Nazi and antisemitism. It’s a lopsided war between two entities that hate each other due to 70+ years of conflict.
So even if it’s 40k, that means Israel’s on pace to complete this “genocide” in about 30 years assuming zero children are born in that span.
Fwiw, I’m not pro Israel, but rather against people just throwing out extreme words like Genocide, Nazi and antisemitism. It’s a lopsided war between two entities that hate each other due to 70+ years of conflict.
In 1948, the United Nations Genocide Convention defined genocide as any of five "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group". These five acts were: killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children out of the group. Victims are targeted because of their real or perceived membership of a group, not randomly“
Gaza is unliveable at this point. 80 percent of the buildings are destroyed. You’re looking at it from one perspective
except israel coordinates with those aid agencies.The only thing preventing Israel's actions causing much higher loss of life is the aid agencies. A third party. Israel have cut off 95% Gaza's water supply and food production.
If I shoot you in the chest attempting to murder you.. it doesn't really matter if a third party saves you... the penalty for attempted murder and actual murder is pretty much the same under most jurisdictions.
US vetoes widely supported resolution backing full UN membership for Palestine
The United States has vetoed a widely backed U.N. resolution that would have paved the way for full United Nations membership for Palestine.apnews.com
I’m looking at it from the point of “destroying a group”
There also has to be intent to do so, which you can argue is true based on some shit Israel’s leaderships said. However, the main intention is to get rid of Hamas. If Hamas is removed/surrenders tomorrow Israel stops killing civilians. In other major genocides the intent was to straight up eliminate the population, there was no other goal. The civilian deaths in Gaza are a result of the goal to remove Hamas. That’s like saying the USA attempted genocide when they bombed Japan(killing around 200k give or take) when the goal was to force the government to surrender.
- In explaining the U.S. veto, Wood said there are “unresolved questions” on whether Palestine meets the criteria to be considered a state. He pointed to Hamas still exerting power and influence in the Gaza Strip, which is a key part of the state envisioned by the Palestinians.
- “The Palestinians are paying terrorists, paying them to slaughter us. None of their leaders condemns terrorism, nor the Oct. 7 massacre. They call Hamas their brothers.”