If Chimaev beats Usman and then wins the MW title against Strickland, was it well earned?

If Chimaev beats Usman and than wins the MW title against Strickland, was it well earned?


  • Total voters
    162
Sure. The fun part will be watching him defend and watching others try to take it. I’d rather see a monster like Chimaev with the belt than a periwinkle like DuPlessis.
 
im more curious about usman earning a title shot at mw with a win. it would give strickland a shot at a rematch against usman.
 
He won't have earned it, but as long as those that have get their chance I'm good with it.
 
that alone ... nahhh

but to add in a W over the MW Champ should say something

we have to accept we are moving into a new age of UFC entertainment television

Great... where having followers on social media allows you to bypass all the legitimate contenders.

Being Dana's golden boy sure beats all those hard fought wins of the MW top 15 :rolleyes:
 
It wouldn't be earned, but he would have proven to be the best. Those do not always coincide.

The win would be earned, but not the opportunity to fight for the belt.
 
Its not Chimaevs fault that his opponents has pulled out. It is deserved
 
Beating the guy on a two fight losing streak, from the lower weight division,

would never translate to "title shot", at a higher weight division.

<DisgustingHHH>

Yet the UFC will pull some stupid shit about "the fans want it"
 
Or do you still think he doesn't deserve it?

What say you?

1-HRmc9ZHy3koCrNH_tvgWVX2Zw45x0LGb_6907HQEE.jpg

No. Not deserved.

But if you beat the Champ it’s still legit.
 
back in the day you only need 2 wins to get title challenge

people are finding ways to discredit khamzat, the only issue is ddp is more worthy but khamzat is the next big thing that ufc tried to prop up for years now so understandable
 
Yes, it’s well earned. DDP deserves it more but that doesn’t mean Khamzat isn’t deserving. Ideally DDP would get his shot first but Dana and Co are gonna do what they want rather than what makes ethical sense from a competitive standpoint.
 
Fight fans love to put asterisks on becoming the path to becoming a champ. You beat the person holding the belt or win the vacant title, that makes you the champ.
 
Fight fans love to put asterisks on becoming the path to becoming a champ. You beat the person holding the belt or win the vacant title, that makes you the champ.

There is not much of an asterisks here Chimaev will beat Usman, the Champion and few other contenders in row- He is arguably the next dominant champion
 
Hell no, blatant favoritism. If he beats Usman (a WW) he bypasses all for a titleshot without a single top 15 win?

WTF, who could ever consider that well earned?

Conor/Holly Holm level win before title shots
 
Regardless, dana sees money in khamzat.

when will fans stop expecting some kind of order and consistency with the UFC title game. Theres a lot that goes to getting a title shot. And sometimes guys get lucky or favored.

hell, volk is fighting for the LW title for the 2nd time this year and he’s never won a LW fight in the UFC…
 
Are you asking if he beats the current MW champion, has he earned being MW champion?....
 
Beating Burns and Usman and being an exciting fighter has to earn Khamzat something. DDP was offered a shot, wanted time, gets lots of time for whoever wins the title. Honestly if DDP showed up he would've beat that version of Izzy that Strickland did.
 
Back
Top