Social Joy Reid Defends Books with Pedophilia in Public School Librairies

Islam Imamate said:
Just because kids don't need to read a given book doesn't mean that book should be removed from school libraries. They don't need to and certainly won't read the vast majority of books in any given library, the point of a library is to offer a wide selection so they can decide on their own what to read and what not to read.
Click to expand...

As far as I've figured out:

1. This "ban" for books such as Anne Frank was only for elementary schools in one county - Escambia County. And the impetus for this wasn't from Moms for Liberty.

2. These books weren't outright banned. The books are behind a restricted section where young students can still check them out if they get a signed parental permission slip.

3. Any of these books are still available in the general public library.

 
Last edited:
Super_Nintendo said:
why is this thread 120+ posts of justifying filth? like what's there to defend?
Click to expand...
Liberal values! Porn in every elementary school classroom, and a chick with a dick to check them out for you!

Wouldn't want to get all "conservative" about protecting children from inappropriate content in schools, and the groomers pushing it on them, now would ya? What are you, a Putin puppet?
 
Super_Nintendo said:
why is this thread 120+ posts of justifying filth? like what's there to defend?
Click to expand...
The weirdest thing is the argument they are okay with anything so long as it is at the behest of a professional. They are so demoralized that the idea of independent thought is terrifying to them.

Authority cannot be challenged. If you do so, you’re an authoritarian.
 
Super_Nintendo said:
why is this thread 120+ posts of justifying filth? like what's there to defend?
Click to expand...
Well, for example, The Diary of Anne Frank, one of the books highlighted by Joy Reid, is not filth. That's what there is to defend.
 
HOLA said:
Well, for example, The Diary of Anne Frank, one of the books highlighted by Joy Reid, is not filth. That's what there is to defend.
Click to expand...
No one here is saying that should be banned. We’ve consistently said graphic sexual content.
 
Rob Battisti said:
No one here is saying that should be banned. We’ve consistently said graphic sexual content.
Click to expand...
She talks about masturbating and being attracted to other women. Didn't you ever read it?
 
HOLA said:
Well, for example, The Diary of Anne Frank, one of the books highlighted by Joy Reid, is not filth. That's what there is to defend.
Click to expand...

this is a red herring. the elephant in the room is the LGBTQ+ cult trying to brainwash children.
 
Super_Nintendo said:
this is a red herring. the elephant in the room is the LGBTQ+ cult trying to brainwash children.
Click to expand...
Lol it's not a red herring; it's literally one of the examples Joy Reid listed in the video of the OP.
 
Jack V Savage said:
Putting aside the errors in the snipped portion (this is actually a very, very long-running issue, though it's true that there's a resurgence in rightists trying to ban controversial content), this is such a dishonest point. There are no notable figures advocating porn in children's libraries. If you can't make a point without completely implausible strawmen, you're basically already admitting that you're wrong.
Click to expand...

What are you even talking about? Joy Reid is literally doing just that very thing in the video in the OP.
 
Super_Nintendo said:
this is a red herring. the elephant in the room is the LGBTQ+ cult trying to brainwash children.
Click to expand...
They are not "trying" they are doing. They have already caused an increase in "gender" confusion and "lgbtq+" identification.

Even among "Conservatives" it's almost impossible to see actual critiques of homosexuality. A lot of Conservatives have became cowards who will now say they are okay with homosexuality so long as they don't push it on children.

A truly logical and fair society would say the truth that homosexual activity provides no benefit ( cannot reproduce ) and has a lot of negatives ( adverse health/disease spread ) and that although it's possible a homosexual can be a good person or contribute the very act of homosexuality in itself is harmful and destructive to a society.
 
HOLA said:
Rules
Posting- Posting in the War Room is only available after posters have received their Blue Belt (500 posts).

<{Red Card}>
Click to expand...
Cool maybe I can spend a decade of my life on this forum and rack up over ten thousands posts defending sodomy like you before I express my opinion on here.
 
Super_Nintendo said:
is he reading anne frank?

Click to expand...

Why waste your time? The guy will never be critical of the lgbtq+ movement because he is either lgbtq+ himself or is so far into team politics that he is okay with them being predators or children. I would be willing to bet by his post count and beliefs that he likely has no children himself and thus has no real skin in the game anyway.
 
ExposetheNose said:
Why waste your time? The guy will never be critical of the lgbtq+ movement because he is either lgbtq+ himself or is so far into team politics that he is okay with them being predators or children. I would be willing to bet by his post count and beliefs that he likely has no children himself and thus has no real skin in the game anyway.
Click to expand...
What are my beliefs?
 
HOLA said:
What are my beliefs?
Click to expand...
You are here to provide defense and cover for Joy Reid and the lgbtq+ ideology specifically when it comes to promoting their ideology in literature to young children. You fail to ever express criticism at any aspect of lgbtq+ promotion whether its children's entertainment, classrooms, mandatory drag shows, sexual content in books etc. You also only seem to be critical of "book bans" when it's your team who is the victim of it. Somehow you are never advocating for "racist" or "sexist" or "transphobic" or "homophobic" literature to be allowed into these libraries either.
 
ExposetheNose said:
You are here to provide defense and cover for Joy Reid and the lgbtq+ ideology specifically when it comes to promoting their ideology in literature to young children. You fail to ever express criticism at any aspect of lgbtq+ promotion whether its children's entertainment, classrooms, mandatory drag shows, sexual content in books etc. You also only seem to be critical of "book bans" when it's your team who is the victim of it. Somehow you are never advocating for "racist" or "sexist" or "transphobic" or "homophobic" literature to be allowed into these libraries either.
Click to expand...
Wow, you just made your first post here and already you apparently know every nook and cranny of my psyche! Incredible.

Obviously, there's quite a bit of projection going on here. Anne Frank's diary doesn't have anything to do with teams. It's been a cornerstone of English classes in American schools since before we were born. Our chuds, much like their Dear Orange Leader, don't even read books. This is clear not only from their grammar, diction and lack of knowledge, but because a few have explicitly said so, apparently with pride. What these Karens are doing is dishonest and ludicrous, but because people feel a political affinity with them, they'll defend it. Suddenly, they're literature critics, with puritanical views about sex...except when it comes to worshipping the pussygrabber who cheats on his wife with prostitutes and was good friends with Epstein.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,238,220
Messages
55,544,865
Members
174,824
Latest member
Rank Wang

Share this page

Back
Top