- Joined
- Jan 16, 2007
- Messages
- 10,448
- Reaction score
- 7,002
My post is fine. Yours are normally littered with gaslighting and dishonesty and I'm sure you're just about ready to head down that road here.
The rightist argument is that we should not be subjecting underage kids to sexually inappropriate material. I don't need to form an argument around that. No further debate is required. It's pretty gross if you require someone to make a case as to why we should not be subjecting underage minors to sexually inappropriate material. It's common sense and it has been for decades until radical liberals started pushing their creepy agendas on other people's kids.
and the counter would be puberty and predators exists so educate kids to navigate them.
"One in 9 girls and 1 in 20 boys under the age of 18 experience sexual abuse or assault."
gee yeah nothing we need to give them a heads up about here, they got nothing to worry about.
Many of the books rightist are banning have been in libraries for decades. That is until libraries became the next shiny new thing in never ending identify politics crusade you guys wage.
Last edited: