- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 2,220
- Reaction score
- 4,893
Yeah, I actually think it makes perfect sense.That's debatable.
The matchups we ended up with made WAY more sense.
Yeah, I actually think it makes perfect sense.That's debatable.
That doesn't make sense I'd rather have two good matchups for two popular fighters rather than a squash match between two popular fighters.Probably not. Because the UFC loves top heavy cards.
Cause they didn't realize Khamzat vs Diaz wasn't interesting to people and that they knew it was going to be a one sided beating. I think this is a case of the UFC underestimating the casuals knowledge of the fighters. They figured popular fighter vs popular fighter has to sell well but they didn't think about how pretty much everyone knew that fight would be Khamzat running through Nate.
Plus Dana White is petty and Nate was leaving the UFC so they were trying to lower his stock by having Khamzat smash him. Dana and the UFC don't like letting fighters leave the UFC off a win but they will do it if it means more PPV sales.
No one said the fight was intentionally booked to sell terribly. They underestimated the fan bases knowledge of the fighters and the fan base new that Nate had no chance of winning so pretty much anybody who was a Nate fan probably wasn't interested in watching the fight that's not a good idea to take a popular fighter and make his fans less interested in watching him fightWe've had Germaine de Randemie and Julianna Pena headline PPV cards, but now we are saying that the card (that was intentionally booked like shit) didn't sell well enough, so they paid everyone extra to keep the same fighters on the card, but with different matchups?
And they didn't realize it was tracking to sell poorly until the weigh-ins?
Occam's Razor here is the dude just missed weight lol
No one said the fight was intentionally booked to sell terribly.
Ok, I do think the match ups were a problem though. Khamzat vs Nate was announced well in advanced and I was seeing all over Facebook MMA pages how everyone knew Nate had no chance and people weren't interested in seeing it.I'm the one saying this.
It WAS intentionally booked like shit to reduce Nate's drawing/star power at the time. Remember that Ferguson/Li + Holland/Rodriguez were both late adds to the card only because there was so much uproar about what a dog shit card it was.
Without those fights, the co-main was supposed to be like Walker vs Cutelaba iirc, just weeks out of the event date.
I remember this super clearly because it's the only PPV I've ever been to in-person and I vividly remember the uproar for months prior about how terrible the card was until a few weeks before the event.
Ok, I do think the match ups were a problem though. Khamzat vs Nate was announced well in advanced and I was seeing all over Facebook MMA pages how everyone knew Nate had no chance and people weren't interested in seeing it.
Bitterness.why the hell were they pairing a Middleweight with a Lightweight anyway?
Yeah I saw that I was surprised they didn't ask him a follow up question.
https://x.com/DeepWat50503285/status/1714646017407352998?s=20
Khamzat quote with broken english:
"everyone speak about my I didn't make weight ya know, once in my life, and there was some plans to do that, that way it's not my plans, but I can't say everything here and uh, yeah..."
I think this pretty much confirms what most people were/have speculated since that day before UFC 279 which was...pre-sale #'s were abysmal and Uncle Dana knew there needed to be a shake-up to draw more interest. They knew Tony-Jingliang and Khamzat-Diaz wouldn't generate nearly as much money as Tony-Diaz and Khamzat-Holland...they stepped in mid-cut and told Khamzat to stop cutting, they'll pay him a shit ton of money to go along with the narrative that he "missed" weight and boom, all is well.
Tony actually appears to be more popular in every state except Wyoming for some reason. This is only US though, Khamzat much more popular worldwide overall.That makes zero sense logically. Khamzat was already more well known than Tony Ferguson.
this is the same Tony that needed like 10 wins to even be considered for a title shot during his peak run. Meanwhile popular guys get shots off 1-2 wins or losses.