Social Texas reports zero COVID deaths 2 months after Biden slammed 'Neanderthal thinking'

Such anger. The guilt will pass, people with such a shitty outlook don’t tend to dwell on these things.

I lived in Texas for 20 years.

Comparing Texas to NY is dumb. Texas largest city, Houston, covers so much space it takes 1.5 hrs to drive from one end to the other. I figure you don’t understand the point but I’m talking about population density. NY has 401 people per sq mile. Texas 101. You obvious have no understanding of viruses so here is a little nugget. A virus needs a hot to replicate. The more hosts you have in a given area, the more likely it is to spread. Texas is second in total case yet 26th in population density. That tells me you fucks have no respect for your fellow neighbor and that your governor is a dumbfuck that would rather blame windmills for a power outage.

You guys tried dropping mandates twice and both times it created a surge. You got fortunate this time because of vaccines and literally infecting each other for fun.

Lastly, you don’t get to spike the football when you lost the game by a wide margin.

Oh we got “lucky”... shut up.

Y’all are sad excuses for human beings.
 
Both of you are idiots and one day you’ll find out you’ve got 6 weeks to live. If only you went to the Dr. yearly to have blood work drawn.
You’re so afraid of death I can smell it over the internet. Hilarious for somebody with no objective purpose in life to be do concerned about their health. Surely you must chuckle at your conundrum...
 
The real difference between Covid and other diseases at this point is that other diseases don't have a daily death count where we expect people to drop everything they're doing because it's not completely 0 yet. People who wanted to be vaccinated have been vaccinated, and people who didn't want to haven't and it's not anybody else's problem or concern except their own. It's time to resume normal life.
 
Remember this absolute dipshit and her retarded prediction of "Dread" a few weeks ago
106860911-CDC-director-Extremely-concerned-about-the-US-Covid-trajectory-jpg
The CDC should be following science not hunches.
 
Is Mexico a state now?? Lol... might as well be.

And the southern border was where there were huge outbreaks, especially El Paso.

Don’t talk about that tho...

Texas is a state of Mexico and belongs to it
 
Never forget when the Democrat Reich leaders said FL and TX would be riddled with bodies and the greatest travesty of our times with their COVID -9 policies.

Yet surprisingly the Dem Reich was 100% wrong while blue states surged despite the draconian measures. Almost as if propaganda and narratives are nothing more than propaganda and narratives...
<JagsKiddingMe>

In terms of per capita cases the #1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9, and #10 states with the highest rates of confirmed cases were red states in 2020. The #7 (Arizona) is a proper purple state, too, as it turned blue in 2020, but was red in 2016.

Meaning the sole Democratic state in the Top 10 is...Rhode Island.
 
<JagsKiddingMe>

In terms of per capita cases the #1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9, and #10 states with the highest rates of confirmed cases were red states in 2020. The #7 (Arizona) is a proper purple state, too, as it turned blue in 2020, but was red in 2016.

Meaning the sole Democratic state in the Top 10 is...Rhode Island.
https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/public-health/us-coronavirus-deaths-by-state-july-1.html

All of the top 5 and 7 out of the top 10 only if you count AZ as red (as if you question election results) in terms of deaths per capita are blue states. What are you doing is proving my point that the red states were also better at testing

mic drop jpg
 
Lol. The size of Texas population alone and the fact it has opened borders between other states

?? Wales? Isn’t the population there 3 million?
Harris County alone has almost 5 million.


Hahah, even as someone who has travelled extensivley in the States, it boggles my mind the size of the place - 29million in TX, fucking hell! I knew it'd be big, but didn't know it was that big. To be honest, I'd say 29million people makes TX's numbers even more impressive. That's half the population of the entire UK in one state, with few-to-none covid measures in place, those are impressive numbers.
 
https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/public-health/us-coronavirus-deaths-by-state-july-1.html

All of the top 5 and 7 out of the top 10 only if you count AZ as red (as if you question election results) in terms of deaths per capita are blue states. What are you doing is proving my point that the red states were also better at testing

mic drop jpg
The deaths were different because the original hot spots for the disease (understandably) were coastal, and in the major ports of entry. This and Cuomo's mishandling of nursing homes is why New York, for example, is a leader in deaths. The other reason is that deaths were higher early on, before we understood how to treat the disease, and understandably, the more densely populated cities were greater conveyors of the disease. This also meant metropolitan hospital systems were more likely to be overwhelmed. It was only later that rural regions began to usurp this only because of recalcitrance to sensible measures aimed at preventing the spread of the disease, but the hospital systems were never as overburdened because health services were more evenly spread. States that had a more even distribution of case spread saw fewer deaths. That has very little to do with smarter management. The states that managed the outbreak the best are the ones with the fewest cases.

However, if you want to look at deaths, right now, following these predictions, guess who reported the most deaths of any state yesterday?

Florida. Texas was #4.
 
The deaths were different because the original hot spots for the disease (understandably) were coastal, and in the major ports of entry. This and Cuomo's mishandling of nursing homes is why New York, for example, is a leader in deaths. The other reason is that deaths were higher early on, before we understood how to treat the disease, and understandably, the more densely populated cities were greater conveyors of the disease. This also meant metropolitan hospital systems were more likely to be overwhelmed. It was only later that rural regions began to usurp this only because of recalcitrance to sensible measures aimed at preventing the spread of the disease, but the hospital systems were never as overburdened because health services were more evenly spread. States that had a more even distribution of case spread saw fewer deaths. That has very little to do with smarter management. The states that managed the outbreak the best are the ones with the fewest cases.

However, if you want to look at deaths, right now, following these predictions, guess who reported the most deaths of any state yesterday?

Florida. Texas was #4.
FL also has one of the oldest populations in the country. You can’t pick and choose which qualitative data you want when we are dealing with a simple metric. Top 5 states in terms of deaths per capita leading up to now are blue states. FL has no chance of cracking the top 10 with the recent news...
 
FL also has one of the oldest populations in the country. You can’t pick and choose which qualitative data you want when we are dealing with a simple metric. Top 5 states in terms of deaths per capita leading up to now are blue states. FL has no chance of cracking the top 10 with the recent news...
You chose to focus on (1) deaths, and (2) the more recent timetable.

Florida and Texas accounted for 2/9th of reported deaths in the country yesterday.
 
The deaths were different because the original hot spots for the disease (understandably) were coastal, and in the major ports of entry. This and Cuomo's mishandling of nursing homes is why New York, for example, is a leader in deaths. The other reason is that deaths were higher early on, before we understood how to treat the disease, and understandably, the more densely populated cities were greater conveyors of the disease. This also meant metropolitan hospital systems were more likely to be overwhelmed. It was only later that rural regions began to usurp this only because of recalcitrance to sensible measures aimed at preventing the spread of the disease, but the hospital systems were never as overburdened because health services were more evenly spread. States that had a more even distribution of case spread saw fewer deaths. That has very little to do with smarter management. The states that managed the outbreak the best are the ones with the fewest cases.
Flattening the initial curve to buy the healthcare workers time was the entire original plan. Based on the deaths per capita, red states executed that plan much better than blue states. Red states offset their initial spread, protected the vulnerable, and then once ppe supplies were stocked and treatment was available, opened back up and have been successfully treating patients as they come up. There is no way to spin that as a bad thing.


However, if you want to look at deaths, right now, following these predictions, guess who reported the most deaths of any state yesterday?

Florida. Texas was #4.

"Ignore the first year and a half of the pandemic, that doesn't count! Let's just look at yesterday".

You used to be better than this. You are slipping.
 
You chose to focus on (1) deaths, and (2) the more recent timetable.

Florida and Texas accounted for 2/9th of reported deaths in the country yesterday.

Who cares who is #1 for a specific day at the end of a pandemic? What a retarded metric. Its like saying "Why is everyone focused on Amazon when it comes to taxing large businesses? This random penny stock company I found grew their share price 118% yesterday, while Amazon only grew 0.8%".
 
Who cares who is #1 for a specific day at the end of a pandemic? What a retarded metric. Its like saying "Why is everyone focused on Amazon when it comes to taxing large businesses? This random penny stock company I found grew their share price 118% yesterday, while Amazon only grew 0.8%".
It's indicate of the trend for the past month.

Florida's rolling average for new cases per capita is ~4x California's, and 2x-3x in deaths during this period.
 
It's indicate of the trend for the past month.

Florida's rolling average for new cases per capita is ~4x California's, and 2x-3x in deaths during this period.

Can you really not understand why that's irrelevant? You are throwing out a year and a half worth of data to zoom in on the noise at the end of the pandemic.


0tGbHe3.jpg
 
And did anyone read Eric Claptons vaccine story? First jab, bed ridden for 10 days. Fuck that shit.

Second jab no use of feet or hands.

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/...aganda-1170264/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

People are having horrible reactions with stories ignored and muted by the media.

It's so hilarious seeing people say that the virus is nothing despite it overloading intensive care units, people dying from its effects, etc, but people having significant reactions to a vaccine is suddenly a huge thing, despite the latter being milder and rarer. It's funny that some people, that apparently are allowed to live as adults without a legal guardian, can't be more consistent in their arguments, and that they are surprised that medicine tends to have side effects for some. Aspirin kills more than 3000 people a year, for example. It's not exactly surprising.
 
It's so hilarious seeing people say that the virus is nothing despite it overloading intensive care units, people dying from its effects, etc, but people having significant reactions to a vaccine is suddenly a huge thing, despite the latter being milder and rarer. It's funny that some people, that apparently are allowed to live as adults without a legal guardian, can't be more consistent in their arguments, and that they are surprised that medicine tends to have side effects for some. Aspirin kills more than 3000 people a year, for example. It's not exactly surprising.

What is the point of this post? Should people not be allowed to discuss their side effects?
 
Back
Top