have we learned nothing about the dangers of completely dismissing fighters' chances? some of this is getting old.
I'm happily on sage, myself. Just small. Maybe I'm square, eh?
...or maaaaaaybe I see a guy with a huge athletic upside who has taken time off to improve his game at a VERY young age vs a dude who is a one dimensional fighter? (Good technical striker, not much power). I bet quinones against Rocha pre ufc and I (incorrectly) played him vs Gordon.
Sage is also the bigger dude. Wasn't a tiny 170 and quinones should be 145.
Sage can land takedowns, might have more power, and is actually arguably the more experienced ufc fighter here.
I think he wins 2/3 the time. -160 was fine with me.
...or again, maybe I'm a "mark," too.