- Joined
- Jan 5, 2013
- Messages
- 1,682
- Reaction score
- 2,251
It has 58% on Rotten Tomatoes.
No one should ever use Rotten Tomatoes as a gauge for anything.
It has 58% on Rotten Tomatoes.
He was talking about Wonder Woman 1984 having 58% score on RT, not Werewolf by Night.
I stand correctedHe was talking about Wonder Woman 1984 having 58% score on RT, not Werewolf by Night.
Late Phases, a somewhat recent one that is excellent.
Nah, The Howling still has the best werewolf design of all time. Also practical effects, which in my book always comes on top of cgi. And It was made in 1981!!Can't add this image to my post above.
The Van Helsing werewolf looks much more like an anthropomorphic wolf rather than a hairy ape-man with bad teeth.
View attachment 947090
Nah, The Howling still has the best werewolf design of all time. Also practical effects, which in my book always comes on top of cgi. And It was made in 1981!!
Nah, The Howling still has the best werewolf design of all time. Also practical effects, which in my book always comes on top of cgi. And It was made in 1981!!
Loved that X-Files and Supernatural has done it as well....Looks okay, Reminds me of that one episode of xfiles that used the same type of B&W camera work.
BTW have the usual fragile suspects come in to complain that because a Latino actor is the main character it means this is going to be a "woke" show?
Just to name the best: An American werewolf in London is an EXCELLENT werewolf movie. It's arguably one of the best horror films of the 80s.Kinda crazy that no one has managed to make a great werewolf movie, hardly ever. They tried with the Wolfman, but despite an amazing cast (I mean Benicio as a werewolf, come on) it was quite bad. Is there no market for it or is it simply to difficult to adapt monster movies without it being kitsch?