What are the best arguments for moon landing being fake?

[BearGrounds]

What he means by that and what you mean are two completely different things.

We used the technology available at the time to build rockets to get to the moon. We stopped building those rockets, and the technology used in them became obsolete. The technicians skilled in working with that technology got old and retired, and because that obsolete technology was no longer used, there are no longer technicians skilled in the methods used for the old technology. It's not like we destroyed the engineering design documents and have no idea how any of it was designed or worked. We understand all of that and could build an exact replica of legacy ships if we so desired, but it would be extremely expensive, and not better than what we could do now with current technology, which is what spacex is doing.


It's like asking if we could build an exact replica of an old 1920s phone switchboard. Sure, we could, but none of the parts used in that are manufactured anymore, so to do it exactly like it was done previously would require manufacturing all sorts of little parts that haven't been made in 50 years.

He means the tech was destroyed.

And why don't they have any telemetry data?

 

[dirtypablo]

He means the tech was destroyed.

And why don't they have any telemetry data?

Its like talking to a child.

And they do. Tapes from one mission getting lost doesn't mean they don't have telemetry data.

 

[ScarfaceJr]

The moon is made of plasma

Was not expecting to find this here, but yes.

The moon is not physical, it'd be impossible to land on it.
You know those dark spots on the moon? That is actually the reflection of the Earth's landmasses including both Atlantis & Lemuria.



wait till you find out about the Black sun underneath the earth & the real origin of the freemason square & compass logo. Literally as above so below.

 

[Rob Battisti]

Was not expecting to find this here, but yes.

The moon is not physical, it'd be impossible to land on it.
You know those dark spots on the moon? That is actually the reflection of the Earth's landmasses including both Atlantis & Lemuria.



wait till you find out about the Black sun underneath the earth & the real origin of the freemason square & compass logo. Literally as above so below.

What doesn’t make sense about it being fake is they built all those rockets just to fake the landing? When did they decide they would fake it? Did they just kill all those people who shot the video? All the astronauts were liars? No one went to space? Why could we go to space but not land on the moon?

 

[Only Here for Attachments]

Joe Rogan’s evidence is all footage and pictures of tests

 

[BearGrounds]

Its like talking to a child.

And they do. Tapes from one mission getting lost doesn't mean they don't have telemetry data.

But they don't have the data for the original mission, its all been lost according to NASA themselves.

 

[terrapin]

the best argument is that they could not have landed on the moon because the moon is in fact a hollow space station made to look like a moon. so any ship trying to land would have been shot down before ever getting the chance to land.

maybe if they had tried to land inside of the moon at a proper receiving station they could have had success though.

 

[terrapin]

No one who wants to argue against the GOAThood of Fedor wants to be accurate.

this.