- Joined
- Sep 19, 2004
- Messages
- 2,891
- Reaction score
- 1,347
Well he never did beat Nate objectively speaking
total bullshit...competitive, but not a close fight...conor outstruck nate in every single round...knocked nate on his ass 3x...the fight wasn't close...
Nate is a random fighter, get over it."They could fight a hundred times and Nate wins them all"
"Nate's style is too much for Conor"
"Conor can't adapt"
"Nate's too big"
"Pointless rematch Nate wins again easy"
Fast forward a couple of years and the same haters who were proved spectacularly wrong before are back on repeat spouting all the same nonsense about how a Conor Khabib rematch couldn't possibly go better for Conor.
We've heard it all before but fortunately, unlike Conor haters, Dana doesn't suffer from a short memory and can easily recall Conor's heroic return against 190lb Nate and his silencing of those who said he had no chance.
Dana will grant Conor his rematch and it will be the most epic victory of Conor's decorated career.
Who’s triggered by that?
Nice revisionismHe didn't beat Nate.
Even though he "won" a round against Khabib, he didn't do an ounce of damage to him in the 4 minutes that Khabib spent standing with him. It was more a product of Khabib taking a quick breather than Conor actually doing anything meaningful.
Nate was ranked outside the top 15 when they fought.
He won the decision, but he didn’t beat him. That fight was so even, and at the end of the fight the impression was that Nate had got the better of him.Nice revisionism
He won the decision, but he didn’t beat him. That fight was so even, and at the end of the fight the impression was that Nate had got the better of him.