UFN 87 - Netherlands - AA vs Reem

Status
Not open for further replies.
F M L

rarely get freakin openers ahhhh

i still like sasaki sub +250. nice job



yea i like, i guess
You even announced them. They came when they opened the Tuck 7 props =/
 
i just noticed tuck :*(



yep, i hit that one, too, haha
Damn, that sucks =/. The only thing you really missed was that Sasaki SUB line at least

I think I'm gonna do 2s/3s RR with the R3s for like $1 lol
 
Damn, that sucks =/. The only thing you really missed was that Sasaki SUB line at least

I think I'm gonna do 2s/3s RR with the R3s for like $1 lol

yea, cause cedenblad sub price = poop
 
haha, can't watch the bloodyelbow vivi til I get home, but I love how its titled 'picking the favorites'. Looks like they're on the same page as most of us
 
$165 to win $100 Cedenblad + Kyoji

$100 to win $115 Waters/Edwards o1.5 + Karolina/Clark o2.5

Think thats its for now. Was very tempted to hit Gates, still might. Sasaki at +125 would be real square imo. Gonna be a tough fight for him regardless, plus the drastic cut and short notice

EDIT yeah bet Gates actually. $82.50 to win $50
joseph, Im know Im late to respond, but just goin through the thread now. the bets should come through, but if you win 3 of 4, youll either break even or lose 50. those parlays put you in a difficult position.
may be too late as u seem to have bets locked in, but why not bet all 4 at varying unit size depending on confidence so you could at least be in the black if you take 3 of 4
 
joseph, Im know Im late to respond, but just goin through the thread now. the bets should come through, but if you win 3 of 4, youll either break even or lose 50. those parlays put you in a difficult position.
may be too late as u seem to have bets locked in, but why not bet all 4 at varying unit size depending on confidence so you could at least be in the black if you take 3 of 4
Yeah man I think my confidence in this card led to me being a bit sloppy on the betting side. All the favorites I like I have in different ways and plays all over the place. Didn't put as much thought into the gambling aspect as I should have. Its cost me a bit in the past, just have to hope my confidence isn't crushed and a majority of the picks I like come through.
 
Wow @ the Krylov movement... Luckily I convinced myself to buy at -165 after watching the Nedkov fight, will probably freeroll one of the them.

Big movement with the Tuck line as well. If only I was awake. Would have loved his line when all the action came in on Emmett, but still like him at lot at -145.
 
That Bigfoot hair

ChmjS11WEAAwk0h.jpg

Scaryfoot more like

does the beard help the chin though lol
 
365 have a new market for the fights starting with this event. 'Method of Victory - Double Chance'. Could be a great market for parlays and even straight bets if the odds are tasty enough.

Quite like for example: 'Struve to win by KO/TKO or Decision' at odds of 1.83 (-120). Don't really see the fight ending any other way personally.

Awesome. I know Paddy do this but limited there.

Limited to £600 on that above play but agree lovely line and play really, nice to see b365 doing more prop options but it appears limited to 2-3 fights still and I noticed they have been very stingy and not even offered half the props for the past few events, miss them insane decision lines in close fights !
 
Full training camp, spirits are high, cardio is high, I'm always super aggressive, I gained 10-15 pounds this camp, stronger

 
wow Randamie also has a full time job... teaches, personal trainer and does security every day.

 
Sup y'all.

Reading through the thread hastily I've got some reassurances and my eyebrow raised a few times.

I'll mostly be on the dogs for this card. I like Wade and Bigfoot, also considering Nelson, Barosso, Overeem ITD, Sassaki and Barosso.

I've seen a few regulars go heavy on Struve, why is that? Haven't read through everything carefully. I concede that there are many reasons to fade Bigfoot but you can make a hell of a long list to fade Struve as well.
 
Sup y'all.

Reading through the thread hastily I've got some reassurances and my eyebrow raised a few times.

I'll mostly be on the dogs for this card. I like Wade and Bigfoot, also considering Nelson, Barosso, Overeem ITD, Sassaki and Barosso.

I've seen a few regulars go heavy on Struve, why is that? Haven't read through everything carefully. I concede that there are many reasons to fade Bigfoot but you can make a hell of a long list to fade Struve as well.

Honestly, I agree with about every play that you have. I have not played Gunnar/Tumenov yet though. That one is a head scratcher for me.
 
I've seen a few regulars go heavy on Struve, why is that? Haven't read through everything carefully. I concede that there are many reasons to fade Bigfoot but you can make a hell of a long list to fade Struve as well.
Seeing the stat of Bigfoot failing on his 5 td attempts in his last 10 fights sealed the deal for me. No chance i'd play Bigfoot vs anyone in a striking battle when the gust of wind from Struve's missed punches could likely KO him. Also like everything i've been hearing from Struve regarding his improvements and how aggressive he plans on being.
 
Sup y'all.

Reading through the thread hastily I've got some reassurances and my eyebrow raised a few times.

I'll mostly be on the dogs for this card. I like Wade and Bigfoot, also considering Nelson, Barosso, Overeem ITD, Sassaki and Barosso.

I've seen a few regulars go heavy on Struve, why is that? Haven't read through everything carefully. I concede that there are many reasons to fade Bigfoot but you can make a hell of a long list to fade Struve as well.

I'm gonna be with you as well on bigfoot. Just watching prices.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top