Social Gina Carano tosses her hat into social media politics #fireginacorano trends

This is ridiculous. I'm on #TeamGina for this one. This is the kind of crap that makes me not want to associate with the "left". At least Maher calls her out on it. You just can't call someone a Nazi. It's funny how Gina gets cancelled for making a poor comparison but these dummies can call regular people Nazis and that's fine. They are belittling what a Nazi was and what they did.

 
This is ridiculous. I'm on #TeamGina for this one. This is the kind of crap that makes me not want to associate with the "left". At least Maher calls her out on it. You just can't call someone a Nazi. It's funny how Gina gets cancelled for making a poor comparison but these dummies can call regular people Nazis and that's fine. They are belittling what a Nazi was and what they did.



I don't think anyone would have cared if Gina had called someone a Nazi, that word lost a lot of potency years ago and is mostly meaningless. White supremacist is the expression used most often these days, and this woman clarified by pointing out Gina hangs out with them. If it isn't true, that could be considered defamation.

Gina got in trouble for a history of politically charged statements culminating in an image of a Jewish woman being hunted by a mob. Disney didn't want any more of her noise and let her go, which is fine. She had been warned but ignored the warning. Pedro Pascal was also warned and he shut his yap. I don't think it's unreasonable for people with such public professions to be held to a different standard.
 
ugh lmao
you really need to get off 4chan before the internet brain rot sets in any further
youre indoctrinated, not enlightned

'power and control issues' lol the fuck
this 'lesser men' trip you're on clearly comes from some deep seated issues
ok mister ubermensch
im a PoC on the internet, don't talk shit to me about anonymous bullying or using black people as justification
indeed, i strongly suspect youre the kind that partakes

the nebulous reasoning here is that they were both guilty of 'the very same thought crime'
the fact that you can't see any nuance beyond that they both referenced the holocaust is evidence that you can't be reasoned with
but if arguing that selflessness and selfishness are the same thing is the hill you want to die on, go nuts

unlike you, i havent made any attempts to ignore anything
look at all the rape and death threats from gamergate, or those leveled at women who make rape and assault allegations, or against any woman who dares encroach in any domain that macho douchebags and incels consider a safe space
the idea that you think one side is responsible for this, or even that my 'side' (whatever you think that is) is the side that is more responsible, is a fucking joke

white conservatives are not a marginalised group
the fact that they think shit like getting fact checked on twitter is censorship and oppression (on par with the holocaust), shows how entitled and out of touch with reality they are

white extremists aren't terrorists, are just decrying censorship and are actually kind of harmless
holy shit dude, that's gotta be one of the worst things i've ever heard (watch out you might get cancelled lmao), along with being the whitest

you aren't good at arguing
in fact, for a person who clearly spends too much of their time doing it, you're quite bad at it
you have repeatedly;
re-framed issues at hand in deliberately naive ways
attacked strawmen
attributed to me positions i havent taken
argued against points i havent made
and projected onto me and my 'side' what you and your side are guilty of

but hey, i've been doing this long enough to know that all of that shit is par for the course

let me leave you with some wisdom from the better part of 20 years of pointless internet arguments:
-white dudes who are completely and utterly convinced of their own intelligence are never any where near as smart as they think they are
-you don't have some unique, direct access to objective reality, you are not innately rational or unbiased - you are merely unaware of your own biases or unwilling to address them. Might call it, being snowblinded by your own whiteness, or, not being able to see past the length of your dick. White dudes are of course susceptible to both
-your position doesn't withstand all criticism, you just dismiss criticism, and have never examined it on your own (you might not be capable)
-facts are not what you think they are, and it belies naivety to think they will solve all arguments. In fact, the facts suggest that people tend not to adjust or reject their previous positions when shown that the facts are against them

also, holdin onto an untenable argument rather than adjusting it, is not a sign of the strength of your position
i guess you would consider it a kind of weakness, and of course, only 'lesser men' have weaknesses
i bet you always have to have the last word too, it means youve won right
in all honestly, it's probably symptomatic of a personality disorder

i can promise you, there's no militant organisation of blue haired pussies who are trying to take over twitter so they can have the power to cancel anyone who has an opinion they disagree with - or whatever the fuck it is you live in fear of
just like there were no SJWs, feminist nazis or left wing fascists
your lot loves to invent imaginary opponents so you can attribute to them ridiculous positions to score cheap victories against
and so you don't have to admit that what youre actually against is any change to the status quo

anyways, gina carano is old news mate
im sure youre busy being oppressed by a cartoon animal for kids not being sexual enough

Jesus. The Cringe level of this post is off the charts
 
This is ridiculous. I'm on #TeamGina for this one. This is the kind of crap that makes me not want to associate with the "left". At least Maher calls her out on it. You just can't call someone a Nazi. It's funny how Gina gets cancelled for making a poor comparison but these dummies can call regular people Nazis and that's fine. They are belittling what a Nazi was and what they did.


Holy fucking shit, that lady just called Gina Carano a Nazi. She wasn't joking. She was being dead serious. She genuinely believes that Gina is a white supremacist Neo-Nazi because of that tweet.

16Pe.gif
 
This is ridiculous. I'm on #TeamGina for this one. This is the kind of crap that makes me not want to associate with the "left". At least Maher calls her out on it. You just can't call someone a Nazi. It's funny how Gina gets cancelled for making a poor comparison but these dummies can call regular people Nazis and that's fine. They are belittling what a Nazi was and what they did.



I would file a lawsuit for defamation.

fucking ridiculous.
 
You can even hear her almost call Gina a white supremacist after calling her a Nazi. Bill cuts her off and then she changes to saying she hangs around with white supremacists. You mean like King of the Jews Ben Shaprio?

These people are insane. They are Democrats. They aren't on the left. They only care about their side winning. Since Gina has aligned with the conservatives, she's now their mortal enemy.
 
"I don't give a shit about celebrities' ......muh Kapernicks!"

Don't talk shit to me about black celebrities, you fucking devil. Using black people to justify your power and control issues is yet another dishonest tactic by lesser men. FOH.

Kapernick was offered a contract, even after getting benched for Blaine Frickin Gabbert, and he priced himself out of his job.

This line of shit your trying to feed me about women's rights doesn't square with your studious attempts to ignore the rape and death threats women like Martina Navatalovia, J.K. Rowling, and Lindsay Shepard and Gina Carano have received for speaking out on their views about womanhood. Take a big fat guess who was bullying those dangerous terrifying wimmen!

"He was speaking up for people that can't do it themselves."

No, he was virtue signaling. Because if he truly meant what he said he wouldn't have erased the post.

What rulebook in a liberal society states that "sticking up for people who can't do it themselves" trumps having a simple opinion? Who gets to determine that?

People like yourself?

You yourself already made the the determination that one post about the shoah was more acceptable than the other. Your nebulous reasoning for this was because he was on the right side. (The side you agree with) Whereas Gina, who works for a company that likes to talk about empowering woman, isn't on your side. You proved my point.

Talking to me about strawmen? How about you take it easy with the Daesh comparisons. Decrying censorship isn't the same thing as being in a terroristic death cult.

One is illegal and the other is actually kinda harmless. Unless you're a pussy.

source.gif
 
i dont know what half that inane rambling to do with anything, but you clearly need to get off 4chan


i don't have social media, or give a shit about any celebrities
but the only thing i vaguely remember seeing from Pascal is retweeting an image comparing ICE keeping kids in cages to concentration camps
that's not a double standard, and it's blatant false equivalence to suggest that it is
but but but they both invoked the holocaust - is a (deliberately) naive construction
his was speaking up for people who can't do it for themselves
hers was typical white conservative self-victimisation
people can argue that what he did was wide of the mark - but to say it's the 'very same thought crime' is an embarrassingly ridiculous reach

regarding this shit (not carano specifically) one of the best ways i've seen it put is - you're not being bullied, you're picking a fight, then playing the victim
these people are karens but they think they're rosa parks

you wanna talk about scary women - go start shit in the at least weekly threads on here about how women belong in the kitchen not in the cage
you wanna talk about bullying and death threats go take a look at any black celebrities social media feed. hell probably doesn't even have to be a celebrity
go look at the death and rape threats and doxxing that happens to women who speak out against sexism and sexual assault
then tell me which 'side' uses anonymous bullying as its first resort

she didn't have her livelihood taken away - she got picked up by someone else almost immediately
no a single fucking one of 'you and your ilk' are decrying that kaepernick had his career ended by 'cancel culture' for the crime of non-violently protesting racist police brutality
im sure there are plenty of people - even those who work for disney - who said or did worse things and faced lesser or no consequences
like i said, disney doesnt actually give a shit - she just drew enough attention that they were worried it would cost them money

if you think de-platforming doesn't do shit, go argue that isis and islamic extremist groups should be able to operate out in the open on mainstream social media sites the way white extremism is allowed to

if you think this is about cancelling everyone from 'the other political tribe' you obviously don't get it and have no intention of trying
but im sure all those straw men youre burning keep you warm at night
<Dany07>
 
I don't think anyone would have cared if Gina had called someone a Nazi, that word lost a lot of potency years ago and is mostly meaningless. White supremacist is the expression used most often these days, and this woman clarified by pointing out Gina hangs out with them. If it isn't true, that could be considered defamation.

Gina got in trouble for a history of politically charged statements culminating in an image of a Jewish woman being hunted by a mob. Disney didn't want any more of her noise and let her go, which is fine. She had been warned but ignored the warning. Pedro Pascal was also warned and he shut his yap. I don't think it's unreasonable for people with such public professions to be held to a different standard.

Translation: cancel culture is ok because in this case it's a right winger.
 
Translation: cancel culture is ok because in this case it's a right winger.

No, that isn't what I said.

A right winger and a left winger were both guilty of the same crime.

They were told to stop and the left winger stopped immediately, the right winger persisted and was fired.

Are you saying this was an unjust result that favored the left?

Also, this wasn't cancel culture. This was a public figure getting fired for defying her employer and making a public spectacle of herself. She immediately found new employment elsewhere.
 
Don Lemon lite, over here

<{dayum}><{Heymansnicker}>{<hhh]

ugh lmao
you really need to get off 4chan before the internet brain rot sets in any further
youre indoctrinated, not enlightned

'power and control issues' lol the fuck
this 'lesser men' trip you're on clearly comes from some deep seated issues
ok mister ubermensch
im a PoC on the internet, don't talk shit to me about anonymous bullying or using black people as justification
indeed, i strongly suspect youre the kind that partakes

the nebulous reasoning here is that they were both guilty of 'the very same thought crime'
the fact that you can't see any nuance beyond that they both referenced the holocaust is evidence that you can't be reasoned with
but if arguing that selflessness and selfishness are the same thing is the hill you want to die on, go nuts

unlike you, i havent made any attempts to ignore anything
look at all the rape and death threats from gamergate, or those leveled at women who make rape and assault allegations, or against any woman who dares encroach in any domain that macho douchebags and incels consider a safe space
the idea that you think one side is responsible for this, or even that my 'side' (whatever you think that is) is the side that is more responsible, is a fucking joke

white conservatives are not a marginalised group
the fact that they think shit like getting fact checked on twitter is censorship and oppression (on par with the holocaust), shows how entitled and out of touch with reality they are

white extremists aren't terrorists, are just decrying censorship and are actually kind of harmless
holy shit dude, that's gotta be one of the worst things i've ever heard (watch out you might get cancelled lmao), along with being the whitest

you aren't good at arguing
in fact, for a person who clearly spends too much of their time doing it, you're quite bad at it
you have repeatedly;
re-framed issues at hand in deliberately naive ways
attacked strawmen
attributed to me positions i havent taken
argued against points i havent made
and projected onto me and my 'side' what you and your side are guilty of

but hey, i've been doing this long enough to know that all of that shit is par for the course

let me leave you with some wisdom from the better part of 20 years of pointless internet arguments:
-white dudes who are completely and utterly convinced of their own intelligence are never any where near as smart as they think they are
-you don't have some unique, direct access to objective reality, you are not innately rational or unbiased - you are merely unaware of your own biases or unwilling to address them. Might call it, being snowblinded by your own whiteness, or, not being able to see past the length of your dick. White dudes are of course susceptible to both
-your position doesn't withstand all criticism, you just dismiss criticism, and have never examined it on your own (you might not be capable)
-facts are not what you think they are, and it belies naivety to think they will solve all arguments. In fact, the facts suggest that people tend not to adjust or reject their previous positions when shown that the facts are against them

also, holdin onto an untenable argument rather than adjusting it, is not a sign of the strength of your position
i guess you would consider it a kind of weakness, and of course, only 'lesser men' have weaknesses
i bet you always have to have the last word too, it means youve won right
in all honestly, it's probably symptomatic of a personality disorder

i can promise you, there's no militant organisation of blue haired pussies who are trying to take over twitter so they can have the power to cancel anyone who has an opinion they disagree with - or whatever the fuck it is you live in fear of
just like there were no SJWs, feminist nazis or left wing fascists
your lot loves to invent imaginary opponents so you can attribute to them ridiculous positions to score cheap victories against
and so you don't have to admit that what youre actually against is any change to the status quo

anyways, gina carano is old news mate
im sure youre busy being oppressed by a cartoon animal for kids not being sexual enough
 
Gina is a Nazi who hangs with white supremacists? One would think you'd need proof or at least something to go on when making such accusations on a national platform. Lacking anything of substance to back up her claims that woman should have to pay dearly.
 
@irish_thug How come I can only "like" about half the posts in this thread? Some posts don't have the option.
 
Back
Top