They’re setting us up for something. Don’t buy it.
You really think the US govt is coming out with this shit just wanting to be honest with us?
I think that people like the TS are grossly misunderstanding what the report actually said.
It was just a list of incidents that they cannot confirm. It wasn't certification of mystery tech, let alone extraterrestrial ones. So to answer your question, the majority of the public are waiting for something more concrete than eyewitness accounts that cannot be corroborated.
I love YouTuber's who think high-level military analysts never considered things like mylar balloons or Bokeh and paralax effects. <45>
some of the accounts were corroborated friend, by multiple instruments even. also--
that is a lot more than what the gov was admitting to before the report.
here is a summary to set the record straight. 3 minutes in for the rundown on multiple sensor reports and unusual moving patterns and flight.
the report says that this is NOT our tech and not our allies tech
Bro, look at the video I linked above.
And these two:
Birds and run of the mill out of focus subjects are NOT our tech and NOT our allies tech.
Yeah but that is NOT the context of the report and nobody thinks that and i think you know that.
They are simply sowing the seeds right now.The big stuff will be used for the next crisis.
Those videos represent the best of the best when it comes to UFO footage released from the Pentagon.
Birds
Airplanes
Out of focus cameras
This is now disingenuously bad faith posting from you and you know it. The report rules out that kind of thing and you know it unless you haven't read it and then you shouldn't be discussing it.
If you just want to make fun of something don't reply to me or post to me friend. Im not here to argue for fun.
Im here to discuss this inteligently and in good faith.
In a limited number of incidents, UAP reportedly appeared to exhibit unusual flight characteristics. These observations could be the result of sensor errors, spoofing, or observer misperception and require additional rigorous analysis.
There are probably multiple types of UAP requiring different explanations based on the range of appearances and behaviors described in the available reporting. Our analysis of the data supports the construct that if and when individual UAP incidents are resolved they will fall into one of five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, USG or U.S. industry foreign adversary systems, and a catchall “other” bin
- the report says that this is NOT our tech and not our allies tech
Agree. People have been hearing about UFOs for so long that they dont pay attention when there is actual evidence. I usually dismiss the UFOs with lights. I would think they wouldnt require lights if they have figured out time travel. You know damn well there have to be many more photos and video. They could at least release some of this info. They dont have to mention the word alien. This was on another thread. Ive never seen this pic before. Regarding the gubmit report. I will never expect much from a group that steals my money then uses it against me.The people who care already knew these things exist, the government has never been more obviously untrustworthy, people are afraid of other things and distracted, with no explanation of what they are or might be leaves people interested, and other reasons...