- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 92,834
- Reaction score
- 28,720
I wouldn't say that bill prevents the acknowledging of gay people. As the father of a 5 year old I am curious as to why she would have to be exposed to LGBTQ+ issues at all in the classroom outside of someone having 2 moms, 2 dads, etc., or, a teacher for some odd reason needing to expose that they have a same sex significant other.
That's the sort of exposure that is being targeted, no? If it were confined to actually bad stuff, there wouldn't be any argument about it.
yes, changes are 100% occurring because of their stance with the governor. But it seems more to me that previously held advantages are being scaled back and they are being treated like other similar private businesses as opposed to being a special class. Floridians have no obligation so subsidize a company that directly and implicitly opposes the citizens viewpoints more than what they are legally owed like every other business.
I think that's the standard rightist viewpoint (that the gov't has a legitimate interest in shutting down speech that conflicts with what the gov't wants). But a lot of rightists have been denying that and acting as if they are actually liberal on the issue of freedom of speech. So people are pointing out that there is a big conflict between that stated position and support for what DeSantis has been doing. A little off topic here, but the rightist establishment has been pushing RDS really hard, and I think the base is starting to spit it out. Wouldn't shock me to see a move to a different Trump alternative.