Crime 9 Civilians Killed in US Airstrike in Kabul, including 6 children

[BIKES!]

So hiding amongst and using women and children as human shields is a sure fire tactic to make emotionally unstable libs give up and point the finger the other way...

 

[blaseblah]

If you are this stupid you should think more before you post, reason out what is being posted.

The shit heads were the terrorists in the vehicle packed with explosive. The US hit with a non explosive weapon. The explosion was the fault of the shit head terrorist. The interpreter and kids death were the cause of the terrorist.

So you would have like it better if the US has let them get to the airport and kill a larger number as long as they got some US personal.

9 innocent people died for 1 ISIS guy. Does this make sense to you? If it had been another country doing drone strikes with 9 American citizens dead would you have been ok with that rationale?

 

[SBJJ]

This shit should be done by special forces. Make sure we hit/kill the actual target and minimize collateral damage.

And Trump was just as guilty of it. Fuck these drone strikes

 

[My Spot]

Biden can claim that none of them had responsible fathers. Worked like a charm last time.

 

[My Spot]

9 innocent people died for 1 ISIS guy. Does this make sense to you? If it had been another country doing drone strikes with 9 American citizens dead would you have been ok with that rationale?

It hasn't hurt before (another POTUS even got a peace prize out of it) so why stop now?

 

[oldshadow]

9 innocent people died for 1 ISIS guy. Does this make sense to you? If it had been another country doing drone strikes with 9 American citizens dead would you have been ok with that rationale?

The one guy was in a vehicle packed with explosive. They used non explosive weapon to take him out. He was on his way to explode the bomb at the airport. All this you seem to discount.

Yes it would ideal if only the vehicle was destroyed and the shit head driver died. It looks like that's what the US was trying to do since they used a non explosive weapon.

 

[Wrath of Foamy]

"If I can't sniff em, no-one can"

 

[Blayt7hh]

What’s your guys better option? Reinvade? Or just give up on finding the ones responsible? Most of you like to cry but you have no solution.

 

[Zazen]

Anyone who followed independent news sources knows this shit happens regularly. So weird to see people after 20 years finally get upset. Just goes to show how powerful our media is. They're trying to justify us getting back there so now we are seeing reports come out. They once ignored this stuff

 

[Hadron90]

What’s your guys better option? Reinvade? Or just give up on finding the ones responsible? Most of you like to cry but you have no solution.

We could have executed a controlled withdrawal on the agreed-upon timeline during the peace treaty. Citizens and visa-holders would have been evacuated weeks ahead of the military, and then we could have pulled military and supplies before war erupted again. If only there was a man who suggested such a plan.

 

[fedoriswar37]

Sadly thats how those absoloute barbarians conduct themselves. Hide behind women and children (some times quite literally ).

 

[Hadron90]

Anyone who followed independent news sources knows this shit happens regularly. So weird to see people after 20 years finally get upset. Just goes to show how powerful our media is. They're trying to justify us getting back there so now we are seeing reports come out. They once ignored this stuff

It only took 8 months for the Bidenbots to start screaming about how the fake-news globalist media is out to get him.

 

[Zazen]

It only took 8 months for the Bidenbots to start screaming about how the fake-news globalist media is out to get him.

What?

 

[Hadron90]

Sadly thats how those absoloute barbarians conduct themselves. Hide behind women and children (some times quite literally ).

The latest statement from the Pentagon does not claim that any legitimate target was hit at all. That was their initial report, but the investigation has not supported it.

 

[Blayt7hh]

We could have executed a controlled withdrawal on the agreed-upon timeline during the peace treaty. Citizens and visa-holders would have been evacuated weeks ahead of the military, and then we could have pulled military and supplies before war erupted again. If only there was a man who suggested such a plan.

And terrorism was solved forever

 

[PulsingJones]

You were saying?


https://www.theatlantic.com/interna...-it-fired-rockets-from-civilian-areas/380149/

https://unwatch.org/un-admits-palestinians-fired-rockets-unrwa-schools/

https://www.vox.com/2014/7/17/59121...-rockets-in-schools-but-israel-doesnt-have-to

You were saying?

Impunity for Laws-of-War Violations during the Gaza War | HRW

Human Rights Watch investigated 19 incidents involving 53 civilian deaths in Gaza that Israel said were the result of Hamas fighting in densely populated areas and did not find evidence for existence of Palestinian fighters in the areas at the time of the Israeli attack.

HRW also investigated 11 deaths that Israel said were civilians being used as human shields by Hamas. HRW found no evidence that the civilians were used as human shields, nor had they been shot in crossfire

Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories: Israel/Gaza conflict, July 2014 | Amnesty International

An Amnesty International document (dated July 25, 2014) asserts that they do "not have evidence at this point that Palestinian civilians have been intentionally used by Hamas or Palestinian armed groups during the current hostilities to “shield” specific locations or military personnel or equipment from Israeli attacks."

Wayback Machine (archive.org)

When the UN-sponsored Goldstone Commission Report on the Gaza War was commissioned in 2009, it stated that it "found no evidence that Palestinian combatants mingled with the civilian population with the intention of shielding themselves from attack"

Israel/Gaza: Operation "Cast Lead": 22 days of death and destruction | Amnesty International

n an exhaustive postinvasion analysis of Israeli claims, Amnesty International, stated that, 'contrary to repeated allegations by Israeli officials of the use of “human shields”, Amnesty International found no evidence that Hamas or other Palestinian fighters directed the movement of civilians to shield military objectives from attacks. It found no evidence that Hamas or other armed groups forced residents to stay in or around buildings used by fighters, nor that fighters prevented residents from leaving buildings or areas which had been commandeered by militants.

Note that I usually wouldn't even post links from organizations such as UN or HRW as they are firmly under the US sphere of influence and have turned a blind eye to numerous Israeli atrocities, but wanted to use your own sources against you.

Because Hamas would NEVER use human shields...

Despite their spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri appearing on television and admitting to such.

"Hamas spokesman, Sami Abu Zuhri was interviewed on 8 July, and called on the Palestinian people to use the human shield tactic to defend their homes: "We in the Hamas movement call on our people to adopt this procedure" (Source: Memri and Channel 10):



In the video the interviewer can be heard asking a question which takes for granted the use of the human shield tactic. Abu-Zuhri embraces this method, saying it had already proved itself and calling on the Palestinian people to use it again."

https://mfa.gov.il/mfa/foreignpolic...f-civilians-as-human-shields-20-jul-2014.aspx

Yeah, because civilians out of their own violation heading to the roofs of their own homes to protest their destruction is the same thing as Hamas hiding behind civilians.

If Hamas used civilians as shields, you'd think after decades of bombardment the Gazans would hate them, but in reality, it's the complete opposite. Gazan are in full support of Hamas. This is one of the biggest evidences against the Zionist claims.

Also, using Memri and Israel ministry of foreign affairs as sources... Are you for real? Do you want me to post statements from Hamas denying the use of Human shields? That's similar what you're doing.

 

[shankmcgank]

You were saying?

Impunity for Laws-of-War Violations during the Gaza War | HRW




Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories: Israel/Gaza conflict, July 2014 | Amnesty International


Wayback Machine (archive.org)


Israel/Gaza: Operation "Cast Lead": 22 days of death and destruction | Amnesty International


Note that I usually wouldn't even post links from organizations such as UN or HRW as they are firmly under the US sphere of influence and have turned a blind eye to numerous Israeli atrocities, but wanted to use your own sources against you.


Yeah, because civilians out of their own violation heading to the roofs of their own homes to protest their destruction is the same thing as Hamas hiding behind civilians.

If Hamas used civilians as shields, you'd think after decades of bombardment the Gazans would hate them, but in reality, it's the complete opposite. Gazan are in full support of Hamas. This is one of the biggest evidences against the Zionist claims.

Also, using Memri and Israel ministry of foreign affairs as sources... Are you for real? Do you want me to post statements from Hamas denying the use of Human shields? That's similar what you're doing.

Are your eyes and ears broken or something ?

 

[Crom Cruach]

@oldshadow
In light of the recent information come to light how do you feel about this event and your old posts.

 

[MicroBrew]

This shit should be done by special forces. Make sure we hit/kill the actual target and minimize collateral damage.

And Trump was just as guilty of it. Fuck these drone strikes

Sometimes you just can't get SpecOps there in time or it is far too dangerous. In this case US intel believed the attack was imminent, so time is an issue. To get US special ops there, you run the risk of a firefight with the Taleban.

So the US has to decide whether to let the driver reach the airport gates and explode the bomb, likely killing hundreds - including children - or take him out with a drone and risk killing a few innocent people. If he really was an ISIS-K bomber and had killed hundreds, and people found out the US had a drone armed and ready, there would be criticism of the US for not taking action.

 

[SBJJ]

Sometimes you just can't get SpecOps there in time or it is far too dangerous. In this case US intel believed the attack was imminent, so time is an issue. To get US special ops there, you run the risk of a firefight with the Taleban.

So the US has to decide whether to let the driver reach the airport gates and explode the bomb, likely killing hundreds - including children - or take him out with a drone and risk killing a few innocent people. If he really was an ISIS-K bomber and had killed hundreds, and people found out the US had a drone armed and ready, there would be criticism of the US for not taking action.

So imminent that they tracked him all day.

Just stop dude. Stop defending shit that should never have been done.