- Joined
- Aug 26, 2003
- Messages
- 30,459
- Reaction score
- 1,671
They keep going back to the Red Scare well.
She's wrong. The Green New Deal doesn't even try to hide that it's communism. Everyone knows it is.
She may be a moron but she's right. Implementing the green new deal would most definitely weaken us economically and militarily which would in turn elevate our rivals comparatively. Just the act of printing that much more debt would put us yet closer to losing the reserve status...its pretty much a matter of time as it is.
Not to mention wind and solar are nowhere near capable of powering a fraction of our countries needs....so yeh blackouts and restrictions would occur.
Its goofy and immature but its accurate
Yeah no. The schlub couldn't even get the flag right. It's "for China and China only" but it's a Soviet flag.
China is the biggest producer of greenhouse gasses.
The Republican Party likes to pretend they’re the defenders of freedom and liberty. The reality is their cowards with their heads in the sand, to afraid to role their sleeves up and deal with real problems. There’s a lot of things I don’t like about Democrats but at least they recognize glaring problems that can’t be ignored anymoreYou know what else weakens you militarily and economically? Having to constantly put your resources to reacting to disasters, instead of taking measures to prevent and lessen their impact before they get here. Having to put more guards and resources to a border, because the effects of climate change will cause MORE "illegal immigration". Having to deal with the effects of more fires and hurricanes and floods.
Republicans say this shit as if there is a choice in the matter. You either get on board with what's coming and prepare for it, or wait for disaster to hit all so that you can keep your short term profits and "protect" yourself from boogiemen.
What war does the United States military need to prepare itself for, and how could that possibly be more important than securing clean water, air, and sustainable energy?
Yeah, all this talk about lazy liberals and the hardworking conservative, and yet, whenever we have real problems that need to be solved they want to leave it in the hands of baby jesus.The Republican Party likes to retention their the defenders of freedom and liberty. The reality is their cowards with their heads in the sand, to afraid to role their sleeves up and deal with real problems. There’s a lot of things I don’t like about Democrats but at least they recognize glaring problems that can’t be ignored anymore
You know what else weakens you militarily and economically? Having to constantly put your resources to reacting to disasters, instead of taking measures to prevent and lessen their impact before they get here. Having to put more guards and resources to a border, because the effects of climate change will cause MORE "illegal immigration". Having to deal with the effects of more fires and hurricanes and floods.
Republicans say this shit as if there is a choice in the matter. You either get on board with what's coming and prepare for it, or wait for disaster to hit all so that you can keep your short term profits and "protect" yourself from boogiemen.
What war does the United States military need to prepare itself for, and how could that possibly be more important than securing clean water, air, and sustainable energy?
The bullshit assumptions in this post run deep. The purpose of the military is to kill people and break things, responding to disasters is secondary. Furthermore disasters are going to happen regardless of whether we ruin our economy with socialist horse shit and fake "green" solutions. It's just that we will be too crippled by enviro-foolishness to effectively respond.
We are not even the worlds biggest polluter, and the one who is, China, is not going change for any of your enviro hand wringing. Neither are the other countries in the top five. In fact if they keep developing then that is almost certainly going to increase. We will cut our own throats with nonsense and they will keep on putting out more and more carbon.
You are also ignoring the fact that the US has significantly declined in it's carbon output. Since 2007, our peak, we have cut emissions by a third. Most of that is due to fracking and using more natural gas. You are welcome.
You can't see the future and neither can the apocalyptic enviro-grifters. So I'm not impressed by the end of the world talk. Boogiemen indeed. Meteors, solar flares, and the Yellowstone calderra might just get us too.
Wind and solar are never going to supply our needs both because they are too unreliable and they will never produce the amount of scalable energy that we need. If you were serious, and you are not, then you would be pushing for nuclear energy. Nuclear is the only energy that can make the reductions that you and your fake experts claim are needed while not relegating most people to living in the 19th century.
She believes 9/11 was an inside job. So she believes her party was responsible for the deliberate murder of thousands of Americans. Lucky the rubes in her districts are a bunch of dumb fucks, so she can continue to get elected.