- Joined
- Jul 2, 2013
- Messages
- 31,961
- Reaction score
- 27,979
Presidents are the least protected people and with good reason. Social media companies are protected because they're not legally responsible for what users post. Trump successfully suing a media company would be the worst type of precedent. If Rittenhouse has a case, that's entirely different. Joe Rogan is somewhere in between those two. It's fairly nuanced when it comes to Rogan.I've written plenty of paragraphs on the value of an independent media. I get it.
But. And this is a big but, outright lies can not be ignored by those claiming to be trusted sources of information. Is the pen mightier than the word or not? Is journalistic integrity something or not?
Asking the media to be held accountable isn't censorship or cancel culture, nor should integrity be a situational thing. Especially by those wielding so much power. This conversation bleeds over to the social media realm as well. It can't be boiled down to simplistic components such as elected officials are fair game to be lied about.
I'll link the CNN article about Joe Rogan using Ivermectin. I don't see anything actionable in it. Especially not for someone so high-profile as he is. I think people may be conflating comments on social media or elsewhere saying that Rogan took "horse dewormer" with the actual verbiage that CNN used. They're a well-financed media company. They're not going to leave themselves that wide open to lawsuits.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/01/media/joe-rogan-covid