- Joined
- Feb 10, 2009
- Messages
- 55,074
- Reaction score
- 35,722
If there's a hell, I'm going there for how hard I just laughed at a concentration camp joke.
Whoever gets there first buys the beers, bro
If there's a hell, I'm going there for how hard I just laughed at a concentration camp joke.
What I mean, is that you usually seem willing and capable of trying to reach an objective perspective.The feeling's mutual.
Talking all hard about China is the new, cool way of online virtue signaling, apparently.
Cena said this : "Taiwan will be the first country to see 'Fast & Furious 9,"
What I mean, is that you usually seem willing and capable of trying to reach an objective perspective.
Now, you bring up Germany. If Germany was lecturing other countries on behavior in 1955, how much credibility would it have?
You are calling China a "brutal" regime, and that is true, but you are, for some reason, resisting the evidence that-- from an international perspective, certainly-- the US has been MORE brutal and aggressive.
And if you weigh evidence with any sort of objectivity, I don't think that's even a debatable point.
I get a real bad feeling when normally reasonable people seem like they are losing the ability to have a balanced perspective... it's usually a sign that the winds are blowing in a bad direction.
The vast majority of Afghans were thankful for us being there and helping build some kind of infrastructure and schools. And not sure if you realize this but not all Afghans want to get perpetually butt-fu%*ed by the Taliban.Well, let's see, currently it's year 19 of our little Afghanistan adventure.
We already stole the Texas and Califronia from Mexico a while ago, stole Hawaii, knocked over the Philippines, etc.
It's been a couple of decades since we funded death squads to murder people we didn't like in Latin America, but most of those countries are still dealing with the fallout.
I mean, I am glad t8 be a citizen of America rather than China currently, given our relative levels of individual freedom, but I'll be damned if, I'm going to pretend to have some moral high horse.
Or get all worked up over the dastardly Yellow Peril... plenty of other people seem spoiling for that fight.
Count me out.
Yeah, and I'm sure the vast majority of Iraqis were glad we blew their country up.The vast majority of Afghans were thankful for us being there and helping build some kind of infrastructure and schools. And not sure if you realize this but not all Afghans want to get perpetually butt-fu%*ed by the Taliban.
Source: I served 3 tours there.
We did what to the Philippines and when? So obviously we’re no longer welcomed in the Philippines?
Source: been there 2 times in 2019.
And about Texas and CA... hey, welcome to lawlessness of a couple hundred years ago.
Wow..... uuuumm OK. Either you are replying to someone else or you just ran into a wall and decided to drift away from having to answer anything I wrote.Yeah, and I'm sure the vast majority of Iraqis were glad we blew their country up.
And the vast majority of Vietnamese were glad we decided to light them on fire (especially the two million who died).
And the vast majority of Salvadorans and Nicaraguans are glad we trained death squads to murder priests and nuns and make sure they didn't preach socialism...
Come to think of it, we've only done great things!
Source: USA! USA! USA!
That piece of shit typed that during a break from justifying ethnic cleansing in East Jerusalem, so yeah, that's an accurate description of him.
Yeah, and I'm sure the vast majority of Iraqis were glad we blew their country up.
And the vast majority of Vietnamese were glad we decided to light them on fire (especially the two million who died).
And the vast majority of Salvadorans and Nicaraguans are glad we trained death squads to murder priests and nuns and make sure they didn't preach socialism...
Come to think of it, we've only done great things!
Source: USA! USA! USA!
In order to do business or even work period in a lot of US states these days, you have to pledge allegiance to a foreign country, so not all that unprecedented, unfortunately. A speech pathologist at an elementary school in Texas was fired for refusing to do so. And that's literally against the tenets of certain religious groups like Quakers, Mennonites, Moravians and others, so it violates their 1st Amendment rights in more ways than one. Even victims of Hurricane Harvey had to sign a loyalty pledge to a foreign country, but not to the U.S. before they could receive assistance.What's more bizarre to me in this situation is that John Cena is a former Marine, and practically pledged his allegiance to China...
And CM Punk, who I know is a big liberal, is the one practically saying 'Fuck China.'
One thing you're missing here is that you're solely sticking to foreign policy for some reason and actively trying to avoid the point I am making, that China is one of the most oppressive countries to some of its internal minorities and that it has irredentist claims over a soverign nation which as far as I know the US does not. That makes China a uniquely bad actor in a way that the U jut isn't and "b-both sides" and whataboutisms don't change that.What I mean, is that you usually seem willing and capable of trying to reach an objective perspective.
Now, you bring up Germany. If Germany was lecturing other countries on behavior in 1955, how much credibility would it have?
You are calling China a "brutal" regime, and that is true, but you are, for some reason, resisting the evidence that-- from an international perspective, certainly-- the US has been MORE brutal and aggressive.
And if you weigh evidence with any sort of objectivity, I don't think that's even a debatable point.
I get a real bad feeling when normally reasonable people seem like they are losing the ability to have a balanced perspective... it's usually a sign that the winds are blowing in a bad direction.
I am not arguing with the idea that China is oppressive in its domestic policy.One thing you're missing here is that you're solely sticking to foreign policy for some reason and actively trying to avoid the point I am making, that China is one of the most oppressive countries to some of its internal minorities and that it has irredentist claims over a soverign nation which as far as I know the US does not. That makes China a uniquely bad actor in a way that the U jut isn't and "b-both sides" and whataboutisms don't change that.
The difference between us is that I am staying on topic and talking about the actual subject of the thread instead of deflecting to issues that have nothing to do with the thread like you are. This whole thread was created around the issue of Taiwan, a case where a country that has been sovereign for decades is still claimed a by China and where any recognition of Taiwan leads to a backlash from the Chinese and in response to that you want to play "whataboutism" and carry water for the Chinese for some reason.I am not arguing with the idea that China is oppressive in its domestic policy.
I'm arguing with the conclusion: "That makes China a uniquely bad actor in a way that the U jut isn't and 'b-both sides' and whataboutisms don't change that."
You accuse me of ignoring their domestic policy, but you are ignoring our foreign policy.
Say what you want about the oppressiveness of the CCP, but they have managed not to blow up anyone else's country.
So I am at least as justified in reaching the conclusion "That makes the US a uniquely bad actor in a way that China jut isn't and 'b-both sides' and whataboutisms don't change that."
In order to do business or even work period in a lot of US states these days, you have to pledge allegiance to a foreign country, so not all that unprecedented, unfortunately.